There is only one that I am aware of, with many different applications.
As I would expect, in a methodology that encourages such, as a means of self correction and and increased accuracy.
I would say that I tentatively accept most of the testable, falsifiable hypothesis I have been presented with, based on the currently available evidence, and that is subject to change if new information becomes available. It's not like whether I accept it or not is going to affect the price of milk at the market.
Not at all. It is only when religionists that have access to our government, education system, and my children, begin to present their untestable, unfalsifiable beliefs as fact do I get concerned. If it were not for all of the people killing each other over religion I would dismiss it all as harmless fiction.
"I am not convinced" requires no defence.
Or, you have not demonstrated that your god is anything more than a character in a book.
Actually, most of the time my comments are directed at faulty science, bad philosophy, and bankrupt theologies.
Indeed. As I have virtually no religionists to discuss this with outside of family (the in laws), I have found my time here to be interesting, informative, and at times entertaining.
They make an even smaller impact on my life than Christianity does.
On some neutral discussion boards, yes. However, they (including the Christians) usually didn't last long, when their arguments fell apart and they descended into preaching, and subsequently got banned. Hence my move to this site.
What is an "atheistic" belief?
I can only speak for myself, in that I want for me and my family to have beleifs that accurately reflect reality.
As I said, If it were not for all of the people elsewhere in the world killing each other over religion I would dismiss it all as harmless fiction. When I am not here I do not dwell on religion.
Asked and answered. That wasn't too embarrassing, was it?