Archaeopteryx
Wanderer
See my previous question: why is the universe disqualified from satisfying this condition?Can the first cause be caused?
No, because then it wouldn't be the first cause.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
See my previous question: why is the universe disqualified from satisfying this condition?Can the first cause be caused?
No, because then it wouldn't be the first cause.
Please do.Where's the love? Where's the desire to truly understand each other? If I don't see this desire in other's then I will move on.
So not everything that exists needs a cause?Can the first cause be caused?
No, because then it wouldn't be the first cause.
Forgive me for not expecting this is way too complicated for you.
I assumed since you can write,you can understand logical reasoning.
My bad...
Does love include not questioning a horrible argument?
If it does, you must love being around people who agree with you.
Only things that began to exist.....So not everything that exists needs a cause?
Once again, for the eight or ninth time, you'll need to clarify what you mean by "begins to exist."Only things that began to exist.....
I wonder how many more times you'll be asking that same question...
James 3:17
"But the wisdom from above is first of all pure. It is also peace loving, gentle at all times, and willing to yield to others. It is full of mercy and good deeds. It shows no favoritism and is always sincere."
I guess I dont understand the word "began" from an outside-time perspective.Only things that began to exist.....
I wonder how many more times you'll be asking that same question...
Because the evidence suggests strongly it did begin to exist.See my previous question: why is the universe disqualified from satisfying this condition?
Earlier, I posted 3 videos that discuss the sense in which physicists typically use the word "beginning" in cosmology. Did you watch them?Because the evidence suggests strongly it did begin to exist.
Even atheists in this field of science agree.
Not true.Because the evidence suggests strongly it did begin to exist.
Even atheists in this field of science agree.
Yea, where is the love? Where is the everybody agree on everything?
Maybe they didn't tell you.Not true.
When time began to exist, what was the cause for it?I guess I dont understand the word "began" from an outside-time perspective.
Do you?
Look, if you need that to be explained to you, what on earth are you doing in this discussion?Once again, for the eight or ninth time, you'll need to clarify what you mean by "begins to exist."
Cause preceeds effect. Right?When time began to exist, what was the cause for it?
What's your problem?