• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Does Science Agree With the Bible?

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Nature was different back then.

I'm gong to to ahead and assume the laws of nature that run the universe today weren't as constant as they were back in Genesis 1.

No death.
No entropy.
Pristine gene pool.
Speed of light faster.
All life on earth appeared within three days' time.
Not to forget those 900 year old humans.

8c171e13c61bc825ac2c81aa4925b343.jpg
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So, science agrees with the Bible, but only if you completely change the way that reality works.
No. Only if you completely change the way science works.

Stick with the observed facts and reject the scientific theories/interpretations.
Seems reasonable...
It is.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Can't you chaps get your story straight? It's not really surprising that the disparity in interpretations two people can get from the same source is so huge when that source is so vague. The creation narrative can mean whatever you want it to mean so as a source of facts it's worthless.
Scientists are suppose to be relying on facts, but they still haven't gotten all their stories/theories/interpretations straight, which makes the facts worthless.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,285
52,673
Guam
✟5,161,921.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Scientists are suppose to be relying on facts, but they still haven't gotten all their stories/theories/interpretations straight, which makes the facts worthless.
The Antichrist will take care of that.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I reject your reality in favor of biblical reality, the reality inspired by God.

I prefer the reality that I can actually see all around me rather than the one I can only read about in a book.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Great, so if it adapted it was from a kind. The transition was from kind to something evolved from the kind.

No.

Let me use an analogy.

I can look at different phone operating systems. Let's say I look at Apple's iOS, Google's Android and Microsoft's Windows. Each of these operating systems is going to have to do similar things. They're all going to need to be able to deal with phone calls, text messages, blue tooth, wifi, etc. So there are going to be some similarities, just as there are similarities between sharks and dolphins.

But when we actually take a close look at HOW the different operating systems work, we understand that even though they may look outwardly similar, the actual way they work is different. That's why I can't take the bit of programming that runs Facebook on an iPhone and get it to work on my Android phone. The operating systems have developed their own unique ways of handling the tasks they need to perform, and what works on one system won't necessarily work on another. It's like how a shark's network of blood vessels won't work in a dolphin. The shark needs a blood supply to its gills, and a dolphin doesn't have any. Put the shark blood vessels in a dolphin and they'd be supplying blood to gills that aren't there, while the lungs that ARE there have no blood supply at all.

Now, the operating systems change over time, and they put out updates. But if the Android programming that handled how the wifi connection works suddenly started looking like the Microsoft version, I'd figure that the new code didn't develop from the previous Android code, but was stolen. This would be like a dolphin suddenly growing gills instead of lungs. It doesn't happen in nature, and if it happened in the operating systems, Microsoft would take Google to court over theft of intellectual property. And how would Microsoft know? Because the characteristics were there. The new Google code wasn't based on earlier versions of the same app. However, if Googles new code DOES have the same characteristics of their earlier code, then Microsoft knows that Google hasn't been using stolen data.

Likewise, we can look at the ways animals bodies work and see what evolutionary lines they have come from. Dolphins have bones in their flipers which are a very close match to the bones that humans have in their arms. Evolutionarily speaking, the reason for this is simple. There was a species of animal that lived before humans and dolphins, and it evolved this bone structure. Then it speciated, and evolved, some following the evolutionary line that would lead to modern dolphins, and others leading to modern Humans. Since both humans and dolphins evolved from this common ancestor, we would expect that many of the traits that it had remained. Changed, due to the need to adapt to different pressures, but the basic architecture is there for all to see.

And that is why we know where the different kinds of animals came from. (There are many other ways as well, so we can check. All the different ways to know where the animals came from all agree.)

You just read signs wrong. Kinds were created with similar traits. God created fish, and they may have eyes...so do we..whooopee do.

So why do dolphins have traits that are very BAD for living in water - like the inability to breathe water?

Before you starting imposing your same state past idea as a solution, you must first demonstrate that it actually happened. Then and only then could you tslk about slow evolving in the past.

I submit as evidence all of reality. In addition, I submit that we know for a fact that present state rules work, since we can observe them working. I also submit that the ratios of radioactive materials and decay products we see would be different. Since the only way to explain the ratio we see is by having same state past, then I declare that there was no DSP.

You have not shown it was the same. Back at ya.

Yes I have. And the opposition you are no doubt going to post to my argument does not change the fact that the ratios of radioactive material and decay product we see would be different.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
This is really simple...you either take God at His word, or you do not.

Christ himself used metaphor while walking the Earth. Why would I assume every statement in the Bible was ever meant by God to be interpreted "literally"?

Catholics take him at his word. You don't own that moral high ground exclusively.
 
Upvote 0

ScottA

Author: Walking Like Einstein
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2011
4,309
657
✟78,847.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Christ himself used metaphor while walking the Earth. Why would I assume every statement in the Bible was ever meant by God to be interpreted "literally"?

Catholics take him at his word. You don't own that moral high ground exclusively.
You are missing the point...it's ALL metaphors, even the rocks. But whom has your ear?

I'll say it again: The Catholic leaders serve two masters.
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I prefer the reality that I can actually see all around me rather than the one I can only read about in a book.
Are you saying blind people do not experience reality because they cannot see?

I prefer a reality that I actually experience all (emphasis on "all") around me and not just a reality that can only be seen.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You are thinking of the "square- cube" law?
I am thinking that the ancient giants is proof of a different environment in the past.

The laws of nature might not have changed, but the laws were applied differently.
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
I am thinking that the ancient giants is proof of a different environment in the past.

The laws of nature might not have changed, but the laws were applied differently.

I am thinking that it is far more reasonable to think that "ancient giants" are nothing more than literary hyperbole to make a spiritual point.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
You are missing the point...it's ALL metaphors, even the rocks. But whom has your ear?

I'll say it again: The Catholic leaders serve two masters.

Sorry, but I just don't buy that claim. All Christians serve Christ, and there's just no point in villianizing whole segments of Christians.
 
Upvote 0

ScottA

Author: Walking Like Einstein
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2011
4,309
657
✟78,847.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sorry, but I just don't buy that claim. All Christians serve Christ, and there's just no point in villianizing whole segments of Christians.
You do not know your Savior. If you did, if your arm offended you, you would cut it off and not defend it.
 
Upvote 0