Prove that you don't.
You are the one making the claim. Your burden of proof.
When the going gets tough the tough get going. Darwin just gave up.
Now you are just making stuff up.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Prove that you don't.
When the going gets tough the tough get going. Darwin just gave up.
When the going gets tough the tough get going. Darwin just gave up.
Thank you for helping me to make my point: "With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible."Yup, he didn't try hard enough obviously.
"I can't believe that!" said Alice.
"Can't you?" the Queen said in a pitying tone. "Try again: draw a long breath, and shut your eyes."
Alice laughed. "There's no use trying," she said: "one can't believe impossible things."
"I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was your age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."
Lewis Carroll: Through the Looking Glass
Thank you for helping me to make my point: "With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible."
Nobody fully understands the nature of ERVs.
Evolutionists really want to sell the idea that ERVs are merely remnants of accidental insertion events, however one of the more striking discoveries has been that in mammals, ERVs contribute significantly to function of the placenta, even more striking that this happens uniquely in at least half a dozen different mammal groups.
This means evolutionists are forced to claim that, as miraculous as this event happening once would be, it had to have happened independently that many times... random viruses "just happened" to become recruited for important life-sustaining functions in unique ways over and over again.
Yes, we do.
First, you never show how it is miraculous.
No, you don't. "Evolution dunnit" does not demonstrate understanding, just an enduring metaphysical belief that all things are present because they "evolved"
Well, it's no more miraculous than the belief that any complex piece of anatomy evolved.
But just to be clear, the researchers themselves were apparently surprised by the findings:
"These genes are remarkable, as they are “necessary” for a basic function in placental mammals and yet they were acquired “by chance” on multiple occasions and independently in diverse mammalian species."
http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003400
This is a prime example of evolutionary rationalization.
One the one hand, if the shared placental function were derived from the same genetic source, it would be hailed as confirming evidence for shared ancestry. However, when the shared anatomical function is derived from *different* genetic sources, evolutionists just say they were "remarkable" unique events that occurred after the animal lineages split.
The explanation is retroviral insertion followed by vertical inheritance did it, and we can test and observe the entire process in the lab and in the wild.
That's just your opinion. Where are the facts?
Again, just your opinion. Will you be addressing facts any time soon?
How did they determine that they were different genetic sources?
Don't be lazy. We're not talking about just any retroviral insertions. We're talking about complex anatomy that relies on those insertions to function, that according to evolutionists, was not "vertically inherited", but horizontally, occurring independently in multiple lineages.
Yea just my opinion. Meanwhile, you think the idea of differential reproduction turning fish into human civilization is some humdrum fact of life. lol
Quotes from the literature are not my opinion.
I'm just repeating the researchers' conclusions.
What is the problem that you have with these sequences?
I don't have a problem with them at all. I like to bring them up in discussion.
You have no problem with viral env proteins evolving as part of placental development?
Why would I believe such a fantasy that a placenta even evolved to begin with, much less recruited viruses for the job?
It is not really his fault. Darwin got pretty sick, from his voyage. Most likely from a virus, so he was somewhat limited.Yup, he didn't try hard enough obviously.