Does it make sense from a secular pro life standpoint?
From a secular standpoint, it makes sense to allow abortion at all times.
The crime rate has been quite dramatically reduced by abortion. The poverty stricken and desperate are the most likely to have abortions, and their children are the most likely to commit crimes. So, nipping the criminals in the bud is the best way to keep society safe, to reduce the cost of imprisonment, and to reduce the suffering of humans we can see.
From a secular standpoint, government funding of abortions and full adolescent rights to abortion without parental notification makes the most sense, because teenagers who get pregnant have the highest poverty rates, and those children are very likely to suffer and become burdens. Therefore, nipping them in the bud potentially saves the lives of the teenagers. But if they have to admit what they do to parents, they might not. Worse, they might kill babies that are born. Secularly speaking, it makes the most sense to abort them as early as possible.
From a secular standpoint, the morning after pill should be routinely available without a prescription at drug stores and school nurses, and contraception should be distributed for free at schools.
From a secular standpoint, the more poor, unwanted or sickly humans that can be culled from the herd in the womb, the better.
From a secular standpoint, the euthanizing of the terminally ill and suffering, "vegetables" and those born with deformities or hopelessly crushed in accidents saves immense suffering, expense and esthetically improves the overall appearance of the population.
From a secular standpoint, once people reach a certain age, administering pain care makes sense, but organ transplants or extraordinary efforts to heal them do not. The last two years of life are where we spend a huge portion of the medical budget, to extend the lives of old people who no longer work. Economically and socially it makes the most sense to ease their passing.
From a secular standpoint, all murderers, child molesters, rapists, armed robbers, and permanently ruined drug addicts should be executed, either because of their violence, or the high recidivism rates, or because the nature of their crimes makes them unemployable, rendering them a permanent burden on society. Prison is expensive, swift execution is cheap, and there is a world full of talent that wants to immigrate to the US to take their place. From a secular standpoint it makes sense to cull the herd of the violent, the drug-addled, and the depraved, save tons of money, and get better people to fill the hole left by their elimination.
From a secular standpoint it makes sense to fully harvest the organs of death row inmates, because there are many living people of working age who need transplants. Eliminating a criminal to save a highly-educated, high-earning, highly taxed individual makes great logical sense.
From a secular standpoint, the enslavement of non-violent criminals makes good economic sense.
