• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Can we reach a compromise regarding abortion?

When should abortion be permitted?

  • Abortion should never be permitted

    Votes: 12 19.7%
  • Permitted, but only to protect the life or health of the pregnant woman

    Votes: 10 16.4%
  • Permitted, but only in cases of life or health of the pregnant woman or rape or incest

    Votes: 6 9.8%
  • Permitted at the descretion of the pregnant woman but only during the first trimester

    Votes: 11 18.0%
  • Permitted at the descretion of the pregnant woman at any tiime during the pregnancy

    Votes: 22 36.1%

  • Total voters
    61
Status
Not open for further replies.

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,180
✟544,347.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
KC,
Simply put there is only one morally permissable way to prevent a child from coming into this world and that is refrain from sexual intercourse.

Wrong.

See, making up baseless assertions is easy. Anyone can do it. They're meaningless hot air - which is why I'm ignoring the one you made at the start of your post.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,180
✟544,347.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
No, the nature of the conflict is a matter of life and death, not a matter of debating skills.

Then why are you here debating rather than taking up arms to prevent the slaughter of innocent babies? Something's not adding up here - if this were really the most vital question facing America today, you'd think the people who believed this would be doing more than writing paragraph after paragraph of empty propaganda.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,180
✟544,347.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Not true and I refuted you on this in another thread.
There is no miscarriage or still birth in Exodus 21. The Hebrew word for such does not appear.
All you have to do is convince the people in charge of the various Bibles which disagree with you to revise their their translations and I'll be happy to agree with your assertions here. Get to it.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,180
✟544,347.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I pointed this out to you on another thread and showed you the various translations and the Hebrew. You shrugged it off.

Yep. The opinion of a random anonymous poster on the internet isn't going to trump the fact that various translations do use the word miscarriage. You wouldn't agree with my assertions that those translations are correct. Not sure why you'd think your guess on the matter is any more convincing.

I also pointed out that some English translations fixed the translation as in the NASB.

Just as I pointed out that others haven't changed their mind on the matter.

So unless you are going to show us some exegesis of the verses involved or at least an expository discussion of such, you are just some internet interloper posting talking points from some website.

Or I can just point out that despite your assertions that you know it all, there are still experts in the field who disagree with your opinion. After all, even though you've assured us that your version of this is correct there are other legitimate translations which directly contradict your claim. Have fun convincing the experts who produced them that they are wrong.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,180
✟544,347.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The scholars who used miscarriage or still birth are clearly in error. They form a very small minority and have engaged in eisegesis, the method of interpreting scriptures with a bias.


He quoted it 4 times by my counting:

Exodus 20:

13 Thou shalt not kill.

Speaking of a small minority of translations, I can't help but notice that most of the modern translation disagree with the translation you've chosen for Ex 20:13. See http://biblehub.com/exodus/20-13.htm. Can we conclude from this that you are also engaged in a "method of interpreting scriptures with a bias"?
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,522
16,853
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟772,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Saving babies is going to be expensive and cost us very dearly. It's not simply a matter of decreeing that abortion shall end. End abortion, and the ranks of the poor will expand rapidly. We have to have a safety net in place to support them that is much better than we have now.
Right. That means that middle and upper class families will have to adopt those kids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,522
16,853
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟772,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What scripture specifically states that ensoulment takes place at conception?
Scripture never deals with "ensoulment" after Genesis 2.

Genesis 2.7 Then the Lord God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

And since it was a general consensus that Adam was made as an adult, trying to use that to determine timing of "ensoulment" in pregnancy is futile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟594,696.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.