• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Evolution is Not Atheistic

Status
Not open for further replies.

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,304
7,518
31
Wales
✟432,774.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Others do though.

And I don't find it 'incredibly offensive.'

In fact, over the years here, I've come to believe that people act offensive, just for [whatever reason].

Especially at the saying: "There are no atheists in foxholes."

Well, my reply to that saying is "There's no God on the battlefield."
 
Upvote 0

RickG

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 1, 2011
10,092
1,430
Georgia
✟128,873.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
You and your friends must be incredibly sensitive then, as I hear all the time how Christianity/creationism is responsible for our country being behind in the World Smarts Competition; and I take it with a grain of salt.

The problem lies in "Fundamental Extremists" in both religion and politics. In other words, the belief that their way is the only way.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,304
7,518
31
Wales
✟432,774.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
The problem lies in "Fundamental Extremists" in both religion and politics. In other words, the belief that their way is the only way.

As I said, people misusing religion is the problem in the world, not religion itself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RickG
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,213
52,662
Guam
✟5,154,754.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The problem lies in "Fundamental Extremists" in both religion and politics. In other words, the belief that their way is the only way.
Ya ... posting the Ten Commandments on the courthouse lawn is analogous to saying, "It's my way or the highway," isn't it?
:doh:
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,304
7,518
31
Wales
✟432,774.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Ya ... posting the Ten Commandments on the courthouse lawn is analogous to saying, "It's my way or the highway," isn't it?
:doh:

Well, yes, since putting a copy of the Ten Commandments on a courthouse lawn would analogous to the US government endorsing the Christian religion over any other, which is something that is expressly stated that the government shouldn't do in the US Constitution.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,213
52,662
Guam
✟5,154,754.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
As I said, people misusing religion is the problem in the world, not religion itself.
Christianity being a religion aside, why would scientists rail against the Bible being taught in school, when the Bible teaches "love your enemies"?

Then, after that, they have the gall to lump Christianity in with hate-your-enemy religions.

I don't get it.

But then, science today is doing Satan's work, so I guess I shouldn't act so ignorant.

I'll tell you what, scientists:

Let's all rail against putting carbon in steel, then stand around and pout that steel isn't nearly as strong as it should be, and is no better than plastic.

Sound fair?
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,304
7,518
31
Wales
✟432,774.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Christianity being a religion aside, why would scientists rail against the Bible being taught in school, when the Bible teaches "love your enemies"?

Then, after that, they have the gall to lump Christianity in with hate-your-enemy religions.

I don't get it.

But then, science today is doing Satan's work, so I guess I shouldn't act so ignorant.

I'll tell you what, scientists:

Let's all rail against putting carbon in steel, then stand around and pout that steel isn't nearly as strong as it should be, and is no better than plastic.

Sound fair?

You really have a thorn in your side with scientists, don't you?
The Bible IS taught in schools, in religious education classes because it is a religious textbook. However, you can't use it for science since it is not a book about science.
Here's an example: I would use the Spiderman comics in an art class to teach about art styles but I wouldn't use it in a biology class since it is not a biology text.
Savy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RickG
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,213
52,662
Guam
✟5,154,754.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well, yes, since putting a copy of the Ten Commandments on a courthouse lawn would analogous to the US government endorsing the Christian religion over any other, which is something that is expressly stated that the government shouldn't do in the US Constitution.
What about countries that don't have this [phantom] stipulation in their constitution?

Okay with you if they post the Ten Commandments on their courthouse lawns?

And say those words once a year that ruin scientists day (Merry Christmas)?

It's okay for scientists to call something "El Niño," but don't you dare say "Merry Christmas," or scientists will complain to their Antichrist Lovers Union to come up with a scheme to do something.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,304
7,518
31
Wales
✟432,774.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
What about countries that don't have this [phantom] stipulation in their constitution?

Okay with you if they post the Ten Commandments on their courthouse lawns?

And say those words once a year that ruin scientists day (Merry Christmas)?

It's okay for scientists to call something "El Niño," but don't you dare say "Merry Christmas," or scientists will complain.

You'd have to check with the countries. Britain doesn't have any courthouses with references to the Ten Commandments because it's not necessary, especially considering we're the country that basically wrote the book on Western law. And just because you don't like it doesn't make it not real.

You really have to stop being so negative about scientists. You'll find it's not scientists who don't want you to say Merry Christmas, it's more than likely bleeding-heart, feel-good politicians who want to play nice with everyone.
You'll also find that El Nino was called that by Peruvian sailors, not scientists, because it's effects were more prominently noticed around Christmas time.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,213
52,662
Guam
✟5,154,754.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You really have a thorn in your side with scientists, don't you?
That's an understatement.
Warden_of_the_Storm said:
The Bible IS taught in schools, in religious education classes because it is a religious textbook.
Ya ... they managed to find a place in the back of the bus to dilute It in a class with [other] religions in it.
Warden_of_the_Storm said:
However, you can't use it for science since it is not a book about science.
Care to address my point about It teaching "love your enemy"?
Warden_of_the_Storm said:
Here's an example: I would use the Spiderman comics in an art class to teach about art styles but I wouldn't use it in a biology class since it is not a biology text.
I'm second to none here in saying that the Bible should not be taught in science class.

Instead, It should be taught in history class.

But as long as Satan now runs our schools, scientists have found a class for It, where It will be relagated to myth status.
 
Upvote 0

RickG

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 1, 2011
10,092
1,430
Georgia
✟128,873.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
But as long as Satan now runs our schools, scientists have found a class for It, where It will be relagated to myth status.

How is Satan running our schools and by what means do you determine this?
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,304
7,518
31
Wales
✟432,774.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Ya.. they managed to find a place in the back of the bus to dilute It in a class with [other] religions in it.
That's because it falls under the definition of a religious text-book.

Care to address my point about It teaching "love your enemy"?
You'll find that many Religious Education classes also function as classes on morality too.

I'm second to none here in saying that the Bible should not be taught in science class.
Instead, It should be taught in history class.
Eh... I agree with you on that in a 50/50 manner. It does have it's uses as a historical text, but not in the manner you probably think it does.

But as long as Satan now runs our schools, scientists have found a class for It, where It will be relegated to myth status.
'Relegated' (slight grammar Nazi, I will freely admit that), but no. Just because you claim that Satan runs your schools (remember: I'm British, not American) doesn't mean it is so.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,213
52,662
Guam
✟5,154,754.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You'd have to check with the countries.
I'm checking with you.

How would you feel if you saw the Ten Commandments on a courthouse lawn?

Don't you think that it's ... ironic ... that some people who rail against our goverment will suddenly become flag-waving patriots when someone posts the Ten Commandments on the courthouse lawn?

Sure ... run to Canada when your number comes up -- (they deserve you).

But then don't come back here and "patriotically" tell me about some [phantom] separation of church and state clause in the Constitution.

In fact, don't tell me about the Constitution at all.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,304
7,518
31
Wales
✟432,774.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
I'm checking with you.

How would you feel if you saw the Ten Commandments on a courthouse lawn?

Don't you think that it's ... ironic ... that some people who rail against our goverment will suddenly become flag-waving patriots when someone posts the Ten Commandments on the courthouse lawn?

Sure ... run to Canada when your number comes up -- (they deserve you).

But then don't come back here and "patriotically" tell me about some [phantom] separation of church and state clause in the Constitution.

In fact, don't tell me about the Constitution at all.

The First Amendment of the US Constitution clearly states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Do you know what this means, in the simplest terms?
It means that the US Government must do one of two things:
  1. If one religious text/icon is put in governmental building or in the area of a government building, they must allow other religious texts/icons on or in the building as well or,
  2. They will not allow ANY religious texts/icons on or in a government building.
This is to show that they are not living in a society that is governed a religious group but is one that is governed by the people. Pure and simple.
Savy?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,213
52,662
Guam
✟5,154,754.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The First Amendment of the US Constitution clearly states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Do you know what this means, in the simplest terms?
It means that the US Government must do one of two things:
  1. If one religious text/icon is put in governmental building or in the area of a government building, they must allow other religious texts/icons on or in the building as well or,
  2. They will not allow ANY religious texts/icons on or in a government building.
This is to show that they are not living in a society that is governed a religious group but is one that is governed by the people. Pure and simple.
Savy?
How

would

you

feel

if

your

Parliment

posted

the

Ten

Commandments

on

your

courthouse

lawn,

scientist?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.