Science Says NO to Evolution Theory!

[joshua 1 9]

Reading a book (or collection of stories) over and over again, is completely different from examining what is written, from a scholarly and historical view point.

You see, man can write anything in a book and stories, but to some at least, whether these stories have any level of historical credibility, is what is most important.

I take no issue with one who believes in the stories based on faith, because the book is a work of theology and theology, does indeed require faith.

 

[bhsmte]

God will put you to the test to see what you are made of. Mostly our works will be tested by fire.

1cor3 12 Now if any man builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw, 13 each man's work will become evident; for the day will show it because it is to be revealed with fire, and the fire itself will test the quality of each man's work. 14 If any man's work which he has built on it remains, he will receive a reward.…

They talk about treasures in Heaven. One pastor talks about sending building material ahead that they use to build our mansion there. Some people will suffer loss and others will have their reward waiting for them.

I don't see how your words demonstrate any type of reliable objective test. It is just more preaching.

 

[Loudmouth]

There is a test and there is no cheating allowed on the test. Everyone has to determine for themselves what standards they want to live by. Right now a lot of Christians talk about the "left behind" movie. So for those who find themselves in the tribulation period they have failed the test.

Why would Christians base their morality on a fictional book?

 

[justlookinla]

Have you spent any time researching emergent consciousness or the problem of artificial intelligence?

Not really. Of course this is just one sack of chemicals interacting to stimuli from another sack of chemicals.

As I said, assorted chemical compounds does not a 'you' make.

 

[florida2]

Not really. Of course this is just one sack of chemicals interacting to stimuli from another sack of chemicals.

As I said, assorted chemical compounds does not a 'you' make.

Is there any danger of you making some sort of point?

 

[justlookinla]

Is there any danger of you making some sort of point?

Who wants to know!

 

[Astrophile]

Jesus said: "31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."

This is presumably a prophecy of the attitude of creationists to the fossil evidence for evolution.

 

[Oncedeceived]

I am not sure sure about that. Lots of people go off to fight a war and die for little more then a lie.

Example?

 

[bhsmte]

Is there any danger of you making some sort of point?

I think we are safe.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Reading a book (or collection of stories) over and over again, is completely different from examining what is written, from a scholarly and historical view point.

You see, man can write anything in a book and stories, but to some at least, whether these stories have any level of historical credibility, is what is most important.

I take no issue with one who believes in the stories based on faith, because the book is a work of theology and theology, does indeed require faith.

I am here right now to gain in my understanding of the written word of God. We do that through the study of the natural record that He provides for us. Science does a wonderful job of gathering the natural evidence for us so we can examined it.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Example?

Everyone has a choice to make. My war would have been Vietnam but I made my choice not to go. I have very good friends that made a choice to go. We all live with the results of the choices we make. For example a very close friend of mine lost a leg to a claymore mine. He is grateful for the help he received from God to deal with that.

 

[joshua 1 9]

I don't see how your words demonstrate any type of reliable objective test. It is just more preaching.

You do or you do not understand the concept of consequences and sowing and reaping?

 

[The Cadet]

Not really.

Great, then maybe you should do that before making claims like that.

 

[bhsmte]

You do or you do not understand the concept of consequences and sowing and reaping?

My question was in regards to the test you mentioned. Can you show us how this test is objectively reliable and verifiable? Yes, or no?

 

[joshua 1 9]

My question was in regards to the test you mentioned. Can you show us how this test is objectively reliable and verifiable? Yes, or no?

Not if your not going to answer my questions. I need to know how much you already know and understand.

 

[bhsmte]

Not if your not going to answer my questions.

I asked you a simple question, which you have not answered. Since my question was asked, coming back with one of your own does not relieve you of answering the one I presented to you.

 

[joshua 1 9]

I asked you a simple question, which you have not answered. Since my question was asked, coming back with one of your own does not relieve you of answering the one I presented to you.

Your the one refusing to answer simple questions. I am here trying to help you to understand.

 

[Loudmouth]

Your the one refusing to answer simple questions. I am here trying to help you to understand.

You could help us understand by answering bhstme's question. How is your test reliably objective and verifiable?

Also, you keep using "your" instead of "you're". My inner grammar Nazi is trying to hold back, but had to make that one comment.

 

[bhsmte]

Your the one refusing to answer simple questions. I am here trying to help you to understand.

Were you planning on answering the question I posed to you first or not?

 

[joshua 1 9]

Were you planning on answering the question I posed to you first or not?

Yes as soon as your ready to receive the answer.