well, here's a shining example of the splendid double standard at work, right here at CF.
What do you mean?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
well, here's a shining example of the splendid double standard at work, right here at CF.
Yet no one protested for hundreds of years. Imagine that.
Yet no one protested for hundreds of years. Imagine that.
i'm only telling you what the moderation told me.
the last i checked, "the origin at 150" is a premium article from NCBI
this quote is sourced from koonins book "the logic of chance"
i tried to discuss this with the moderator in question.
he was adamat about me not using the quotes from "the origin" and specifically told me that he didn't want to argue with me about it and "to leave koonin out of it".
i honestly cannot see why ANYONE would want to stifle the truth in this matter
here is a wiki article for double standard:What do you mean?
trust me, they were my posts, and i have the PMs.I seldom follow threads concerning biology, genetics, etc. because it's out of my area, so I most likely wouldn't have seen it, and if I did I certainly don't remember it.
i told the mod in question that is was unfair of him to forbid me of posting this information.I don't know if there is an appeal process or not, I'd kind of like to know myself. In the meantime, I would suggest following his advice.
here is a wiki article for double standard:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_standard
As long as there has been a Bible there has been believers. We have no record of any believers before Adam and Eve.Was there any period of time, ever, where there WEREN'T people who didn't believe in the Bible?
No one thought enough to allow blacks and women to vote for a long time either.
Use to be the women could sit down and do nothing and the guy would support her. Now women work and are expected to pay for half of everything, what is wrong with that?Mistake in my opinion for women to vote, since they have since pushed for baby killing, the destruction of family, and etc. I think they were better off as moms and homemakers.
Mistake in my opinion for women to vote, since they have since pushed for baby killing, the destruction of family, and etc. I think they were better off as moms and homemakers.
That was a quote from someone, I fixed it.It was a mistake to allow women to vote?
I do not agree. I did not remember women not being able to vote. That was back in 1920, before my time. I wish my wife was more equal. She thinks I should pay for some of her support. So I guess she is not a liberated women because they tend to think they do not need a man to support them.Do you agree with the quote?
Yes it was a mistake in my humble opinion, and it had bad fruits. The unborn agree with me.It was a mistake to allow women to vote?
There place is in the home, and not being treated as an equal?
Mistake in my opinion for women to vote, since they have since pushed for baby killing, the destruction of family, and etc. I think they were better off as moms and homemakers.
As long as there has been a Bible there has been believers. We have no record of any believers before Adam and Eve.
I suppose that is what the flood is all about. Even today people still laugh at Noah and his Ark.As long as their has been a Bible their have been scoffers and doubters.