Atheistic Darwinist Creationism and It's Just a Sack of Chemicals

[Chany]

In Darwinism, there is no importance of life other than for the individual to live.

Good thing evolutionary biology is just a scientific theory, not a moral philosophy then.

Also, by the way, the goal of life in evolution is to reproduce and spread its genes. Its individual survival only matters in that it helps to achieve reproduction.

 

[HitchSlap]

Cadet, according to Darwinism, is an individual life important?
Why or why not?

"Darwinism" is silent on the subject.

 

[Chany]

Darwinism yields a worldview concerning humanity and it's place in creation.

Yes, it says that humans (at least the physical aspect) evolved the same as any other animal, given the current data. Even if it was different (man was spontaneously created apart from the other animals), the basics of evolutionary biology would still be true.

 

[justlookinla]

Good thing evolutionary biology is just a scientific theory, not a moral philosophy then.

Darwinism is a belief system which yields a worldview.

Also, by the way, the goal of life in evolution is to reproduce and spread its genes. Its individual survival only matters in that it helps to achieve reproduction.

Darwinist guesses and suppositions, another baseless claim not supported by evidence.[/QUOTE]

 

[Chany]

So, in science...in Darwinism (if that's the right term), is there any consensus as to the importance of life?

Darwinism is not the correct term, and there is no consensus because science does not aim to answer those questions. It merely looks at the natural world, experiments, and reaching conclusions about the physical world through falsification and inductive reasoning.

 

[justlookinla]

"Darwinism" is silent on the subject.

The resultant worldview of Darwinist teachings are not silent.

 

[HitchSlap]

Darwinism is a belief system which yields a worldview.



Darwinist guesses and suppositions, another baseless claim not supported by evidence.

[/QUOTE]
Unicorns!

 

[justlookinla]

Yes, it says that humans (at least the physical aspect) evolved the same as any other animal, given the current data. Even if it was different (man was spontaneously created apart from the other animals), the basics of evolutionary biology would still be true.

Darwinism would not be true.

 

[HitchSlap]

The resultant worldview of Darwinist teachings are not silent.

Ok.

 

[HitchSlap]

Darwinism would not be true.

But Darwin would.

 

[AV1611VET]

Since atheistic Darwinist creationism's worldview is one of a human being basically nothing more than an evolved sack of chemicals, why would selling baby parts be against the law (assuming it is)?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the philosophy of evolution now refer to those baby parts as "fetal tissue"?

Why do they suddenly become "baby parts" when put up for sale?

Is that so they can artificially inflate the price?

 

[justlookinla]

But Darwin would.

Unless he was wrong with his guesses and suppositions.

 

[justlookinla]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the philosophy of evolution now refer to those baby parts as "fetal tissue"?

Why do they suddenly become "baby parts" when put up for sale?

Is that so they can artificially inflate the price?

It was my attempt to accurately define the 'merchandise'. "Fetal tissue" is such an uncaring term.

 

[Chany]

Darwinism is a belief system which yields a worldview.

Yes, it claims that allele frequencies in a population change overtime. That's it. It makes no other claims.

Darwinist guesses and suppositions, another baseless claim not supported by evidence.

Evolutionary biology holds the entire reason life continues is that it strives to reproduce. Reproduction, not survival, is the cornerstone of evolution.

 

[bhsmte]

So, in science...in Darwinism (if that's the right term), is there any consensus as to the importance of life?

The importance and or meaning/purpose to life, is assigned by the individual, with a working brain, who is fully capable of assigning their own meaning to life.

If it was shown tomorrow, your God did not exist, would life lose all meaning to you?

 

[Chany]

Yes, physically.

Because the creator of space and time somehow can occupy a place in space and time before he made it?

 

[AV1611VET]

"Fetal tissue" is such an uncaring term.

Mission accomplished then.

You can't care.

If you do, the abortion rate would drop.

Satan doesn't want these things being referred to as "child in the womb" or "babe in the womb."

"Fetal tissue" removes the stigma and eases the conscience.

 

[justlookinla]

Yes, it claims that allele frequencies in a population change overtime. That's it. It makes no other claims.

It claims that all life was created by only naturalistic mechanisms acting on some unidentified life form of long ago.

Evolutionary biology holds the entire reason life continues is that it strives to reproduce. Reproduction, not survival, is the cornerstone of evolution.

Guesses and suppositions.

 

[Chany]

It claims that all life was created by only naturalistic mechanisms acting on some unidentified life form of long ago.

Evolutionary biology is not an origins of life account- it merely explains what happens to existing life.

Guesses and suppositions.

What happens to a group of animals if they stop reproducing and all die? The group of animals ceases to exist. If all life ceases to reproduce and dies out, what happens? It ceases to exist.

 

[justlookinla]

Because the creator of space and time somehow can occupy a place in space and time before he made it?

Yes.