-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Evolution and the myth of "scientific consensus"
- Thread starter lifepsyop
- Start date
- Status
Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
Provide the evidence that it is design produced by natural processes.
Upvote
0
I already described the natural processes that designed the complex river systems that have function and purpose. Just one example falsifies your claims.
Upvote
0
River systems are complex, and have both function and purpose. They are produced by natural processes. Finding just one example falsifies your claims that these features are only found in things that are intelligently designed.
Upvote
0
justlookinla
Regular Member
River systems? Not what I asked for.
Describe the natural process which created the bacterial flagellum from an alleged single life form. Based on the scientific method of course.
Upvote
0
You don't get to decide what I present. I gave you an example of a complex system that has function and purpose, and it comes about through natural processes. This falsifies your claim that these features require intelligent design.
Upvote
0
justlookinla
Regular Member
You need to be able to support your claims. Just another example of evasion from you.
Upvote
0
justlookinla
Regular Member
Right, it's your choice to present evasion.
You've not explained how bacterial flagellum was created by evolution, using the basis of the scientific method.
Upvote
0
The only evasion is your inability to address my posts.
I don't need to. All I need to do is show a single example of a natural process producing a system with complexity, function, and purpose. This falsifies your claim that these features are only found in intelligently designed systems.
Upvote
0
justlookinla
Regular Member
The evasion is you continually not addressing the question.
Of course you need to if you claim that bacterial flagellum was created by evolution from a single life form. You have absolutely no evidence, based on the scientific method, for such a view. It's the typical Darwinist evolutionary faith-based view of guesses and suppositions.
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
