ebia
Senior Contributor
- Jul 6, 2004
- 41,711
- 2,142
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- AU-Greens
The risk of harm from vaccines is tiny compared to the risk of harm from the disease.as Blackribbon pointed out, some children are harmed by vaccines
Providing everybody else is getting vaccinated.and even if you do not get vaccinated, there is not a 100% chance of the child getting infected
In most countries that goes without saying. Vaccination programs are paid for by the state.so I do agree that children who do not receive needed medical care should be taken away from their parents, such vaccines are not clearly needed, but rather playing the odds
you bet that your child wont have serious complications due to the vaccine, you bet that your child might need this vaccine some time in the future
those are reasonable bets
I am all for vaccines, they are great, we should increase taxes on the rich to pay for poor people who can not afford them
Not really.but it comes down to, is this a good bet or a bad bet, this is not clearly something that is needed to save a child's life like a blood transfusion or an organ transplant, it is a bet
A. The risk is nothing like compatible.
B. By not being vaccinated you pose a very significant risk to others
The NT has a high view of the body. After all, it will be resurrected.also, no matter how well you take care of a body, the body will die
the soul is everlasting
Upvote
0