• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Seal Clubbing

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Animals can be victimized, can't they?
If that's the correct word for it, but other posters have made the point that there are conditions, rules, etc. and that hunting is not without limitations imposed by society.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Animals can be victimized, can't they? And are they not weaker than us?

Man is probably less brutal than nature regarding killing of critters.
 
Upvote 0

nebulaJP

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2011
688
51
✟23,663.00
Faith
Taoist
Marital Status
Single
If that's the correct word for it, but other posters have made the point that there are conditions, rules, etc. and that hunting is not without limitations imposed by society.

It's a non-point. The strong make up rules about how the weak are victimized. That doesn't make it moral.
 
Upvote 0

KitKatMatt

stupid bleeding heart feminist liberal
May 2, 2013
5,818
1,602
✟37,020.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
What is the difference between “harvesting” and “the strong victimizing the weak”?

I don't see harvesting animals humanely as "the strong victimizing the weak". I see it as an intelligent predator using its smarts and tools to provide for itself and others.

That being said, I think humans can also victimize animals in certain respects. Factory farming is one of the huge things that comes to mind. We have a lot of inhumane practices that need to be stopped.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
It's a non-point.

In my opinion, it is directly relevant to what you asked me. Victimization is a function of the circumstances--unless you are going to insist that ANY death of ANY animal is a matter of him/it being victimized. Well, we do have limitations on hunting, so it's not correct to call every harvesting of animals, under all circumstances, "victimization."

The strong make up rules about how the weak are victimized. That doesn't make it moral.
I covered this above. And again, animals are not humans, even if you want to picture them that way.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
It's a non-point. The strong make up rules about how the weak are victimized. That doesn't make it moral.

Do you view yourself as a type of 'prey species' because you are a vegan?
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
In nature the prey always has a fighting chance of getting away which is not the case in a slaughterhouse.

Since when did "victimization" become a matter of how high the chances were that the victim could escape? It's true that, in nature, the strong kill and (sometimes) eat the weaker in much less "humane" ways than go on in even our slaughterhouses.
 
Upvote 0

nebulaJP

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2011
688
51
✟23,663.00
Faith
Taoist
Marital Status
Single
I don't see harvesting animals humanely as "the strong victimizing the weak". I see it as an intelligent predator using its smarts and tools to provide for itself and others.

That being said, I think humans can also victimize animals in certain respects. Factory farming is one of the huge things that comes to mind. We have a lot of inhumane practices that need to be stopped.

We should rise above being mere predators. Our ability to empathize with suffering animals (such as a seal pup who has just watched her mother bludgeoned to death) should make us stop exploiting them for profit.
 
Upvote 0

JustMeSee

Contributor
Feb 9, 2008
7,703
297
In my living room.
✟38,939.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Shooting them is apparently more common. My concern is with the massive number that are killed. Humans have a pretty bad track record when it comes to filling demand over available supply.

Being an omnivore with a decent knowledge of farm animal abuse, I am a poor judge of this ethical dilemma.
 
Upvote 0

nebulaJP

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2011
688
51
✟23,663.00
Faith
Taoist
Marital Status
Single
In my opinion, it is directly relevant to what you asked me. Victimization is a function of the circumstances--unless you are going to insist that ANY death of ANY animal is a matter of him/it being victimized. Well, we do have limitations on hunting, so it's not correct to call every harvesting of animals, under all circumstances, "victimization."


I covered this above. And again, animals are not humans, even if you want to picture them that way.

Any time any animal or plant, bacterium, whatever is killed by any other, there is a victim and a victimizer. The word "victim" is not reserved for humans.
 
Upvote 0

KitKatMatt

stupid bleeding heart feminist liberal
May 2, 2013
5,818
1,602
✟37,020.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
We should rise above being mere predators. Our ability to empathize with suffering animals (such as a seal pup who has just watched her mother bludgeoned to death) should make us stop exploiting them for profit.

You are free to become whatever you'd like.

I am fine being an omnivore and predator.

Also, I am not up to date on the hunting regulations of seals, but AFAIK killing a mother who has offspring still dependent on her is poaching. Which is greatly inhumane.
 
Upvote 0

nebulaJP

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2011
688
51
✟23,663.00
Faith
Taoist
Marital Status
Single
Since when did "victimization" become a matter of how high the chances were that the victim could escape? It's true that, in nature, the strong kill and (sometimes) eat the weaker in much less "humane" ways than go on in even our slaughterhouses.

It never became a matter of how high those chances were. This isn’t about victimization alone. I victimize bacteria when I wash my hands, but I have no moral responsibility to them. If I can recognize joy or distress in an animal, I have a relatively high moral responsibility to it. By this logic, I have a higher moral responsibility to a seal than I do to a lobster and a higher responsibility to a lobster than to an insect etc.
 
Upvote 0

GrimKingGrim

The Thin Dead Line of sanity
Apr 13, 2015
1,237
177
Isle of Who?
✟17,968.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I'm really a nature guy so killing seals of all things would make me sad.

Which is very hypocritical of me to say because I don't mind slaughterhouses being what they are.

I'd say killing seals for luxury is messed up based on my own accords
 
Upvote 0

He is Risen 72

Colossians 2:14 The Law is nailed to the Cross!!
Sep 3, 2013
1,730
696
Michigan
✟27,787.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
God created animals for man to use; all animals, in whatever way we see fit, they are God’s gift to us. God even made clothing for Adam and Eve out of animal skins to replace the PLANT based clothing that Adam and Eve fashioned in order to show us the superiority of leather and fur over plant fibers.
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
22,617
18,573
✟1,473,120.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
In nature the prey always has a fighting chance of getting away which is not the case in a slaughterhouse.

True, there is a possibility that the prey will escape the predator but it's flatly absurd to say that a more humane death is to be found in nature. Compared to a well run slaughter house, say one use systems designed by Temple Grandin, any death awaiting an animal in the wild is much more cruel.
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
22,617
18,573
✟1,473,120.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Any time any animal or plant, bacterium, whatever is killed by any other, there is a victim and a victimizer. The word "victim" is not reserved for humans.

I thought Catholic guilt was bad, then I found out about Vegan guilt.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Any time any animal or plant, bacterium, whatever is killed by any other, there is a victim and a victimizer. The word "victim" is not reserved for humans.

Then you are using the word in a way that doesn't shed any light on the topic here or lead us to think that any particular way of handling the matter is better than the other.

So here's my suggestion. Those people who find hunting offensive should avoid doing any hunting, just like vegans choose not to eat meat. And that's all there is to it.
 
Upvote 0