Sorry to everyone for the extended delay: among other pressing issues that have taken my time, I wanted to go back and see if the accusation that Id missed an explanation was accurate. Having gone back and reviewed all those interactions, I have not missed anything that I can find. However, I was able to identify the source of the misdirection of the conversation.
So, in a last-ditch effort to return to the original topic, I refresh the point:
This is not a discussion of whether belief in God is justified. I enjoy that discussion and would be more than happy to engage it with anyone. But it is not the topic here.
This is not a discussion of whether an absolute moral standard exists, although a mighty effort has been made to change it to that. Once again, Im happy to engage that discussion (it actually fits with the justification for belief in God), but it is not the topic here.
The topic here has to do with a common argument against the existence of God: that argument is that the existence of evil is evidence that God (at least as He is described by Christians) does not exist. Given that this argument has been presented, my comment was that the first question that should be raised in response to that argument is this: If you believe there is no God (and therefore no absolute standard of good/evil) then on what grounds do you assert that evil exists, at all?
So far, Ive seen no one offer a justification (not a bald claim, but a justified assertion) for asserting that evil is a reality, in the absence of an absolute and objective standard. One person has argued that certain things are immoral in their personal opinion, but of course that is no justification for asserting the objective existence of evil: someone elses opinion might be that this persons opinion is immoral: how would one know? As far as I know, there is no way to take that position and at the same time make the argument first proposed in my opening comments.
One person has asserted that this can be done: Why would we need an objective evil? Why wouldn't the existence of a relative evil be sufficient for arguing against a benevolent/loving god? I'm sure I can make the argument.
And my response was Ah, excellent! Go ahead. Make the case for the existence of 'relative evil'. I've seen several attempts, none successful. But I'm open to discussing it. And of course, then the case has to be made that this relative evil is a valid argument against the existence of God.
So far, Ive seen no response to that.
Aside from all that, if in fact everyone prefers letting the conversation go on as it has, then Ill leave it to you folks, and be happy that I have stimulated a conversation.