You have already been shown that the data you are referring to is faulty.
If we took out all of the greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, the Earth would freeze.
By who, fraudsters? They used "clouds" as the premise but they are transient. You cannot disprove the GHG radiation equilibrium by transient parameter, the GHG EQUILIBRIUM simply adjusts to transient variables.
You do not know how or why they cover up their pseudoscience? You pull things off the web by them and do not understand what you paste in your posts?
Second: it may be new to you but the earth already freezes everyday, particularly in the winters. It has been below -20 F for two weeks in Khatanga, Russia, and was -45 F today. What produces -45 below zero temperatures on earth. They are natural factors. You think natural factors have went away?
You are trying to hype an additional 150 ppm CO2 since 1900 as taking over the earth's temperature. All other items like the shift in Arctic Oscillation southward the past two years as CO2 GHG induced? 150 extra ppm CO2? And the North Atlantic Oscillation, the Pacific Multi-decadal, and the Tropics QBO as CO2 controlled? 150 ppm CO2?
What about the tilt and rate of spin of the earth, it's orbit speed, and solar radiation variations annually with the circulation patterns of the oceans on earth - you think that an additional 150 ppm CO2 now has first order effects over them?
.
Upvote
0