Do creationists accept the evolution of plants?

[Skaloop]

I ask again, what other impetus, other than natural mechanisms, are allowed, promoted or suggested in the creation of humanity?

I guess if you ignore the question it will go away.....until it comes up again.

Any are allowed (provided they have evidence), many are promoted (like Creationism), none are suggested (by the evidence).

 

[Loudmouth]

Show me.

Here's the article in its entirety:

SOURCE

The important bit.

"Owen Gingerich, a historian of science at Harvard University, has stated that both views are outside the domain of scientific empiricism. . ."

It is not a valid description of the scientific theory.

 

[AV1611VET]

If your continual 'yer a liar' doesn't bother the admins, it sure doesn't bother me.

Accept it as a badge of honor.

Matthew 27:63 Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Show me.

Here's the article in its entirety:

SOURCE

You missed the quote from the article in post #896.

 

[Loudmouth]

Wear it as a badge of honor.

Matthew 27:63 Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again.

You are saying that Matthew is a deceiver who made up the story?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Accept it as a badge of honor.

Matthew 27:63 Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again.

Whoa! You are telling justlook to wear his false accusation as a badge of honor?

How sick is that?

 

[justlookinla]

Strawman arguments are not honest either.

No one has ever said "yer a liar" to you. Your individual lies have been pointed out.

You're still having trouble distinguishing between single and double quotes, aren't you? Honest, take a few minutes to look up those simple punctuation meanings.

 

[Subduction Zone]

And what day was Jesus crucified on? Since AV has derailed us with another dishonest quote mine.

 

[AV1611VET]

You missed the quote from the article in post #896.

I don't understand what you're saying.

Just because it is "outside the domain of scientific empiricism," that means it's "bogus"?

 

[Subduction Zone]

You're still having trouble distinguishing between single and double quotes, aren't you? Honest, take a few minutes to look up those simple punctuation meanings.

No, that was correct usage of quotation marks. It seems you still don't know how they are used.

 

[AV1611VET]

Whoa! You are telling justlook to wear his false accusation as a badge of honor?

How sick is that?

Cute.

Won't work -- but cute.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I don't understand what you're saying.

Just because it is "outside the domain of scientific empiricism," that means it's "bogus"?

Bingo!! We have a winner. They were stating, by using a proper authority that the term is bogus.

 

[AV1611VET]

And what day was Jesus crucified on?

Wednesday

Since AV has derailed us with another dishonest quote mine.

It takes at least two to derail a thread.

 

[Loudmouth]

I don't understand what you're saying.

Just because it is "outside the domain of scientific empiricism," that means it's "bogus"?

Yep, that's what it means.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Cute.

Won't work -- but cute.

Why not? His accusation was false. You old him to wear his false accusation as a badge of honor. Is that or is that not very very sick?

 

[justlookinla]

This is the dishonest bait and switch that you always use. Not listing a mechanisms is not the same as ruling a mechanism out.

LOL! Once again, list a single mechanism which is permitted or allowed other than naturalistic mechanisms. Just one. Single. Solitary. Mechanism.

I will not ignore your dishonesty. I will point it out every time.

In this case, we have your dishonest conflation of leaving a mechanism out and claiming it doesn't exist.

Point out something other than naturalistic mechanisms. Anything.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Wednesday

Yes, you are one of the few that believes that. Why do most Christians believe that he was crucified on Friday?

 

[justlookinla]

No, that was correct usage of quotation marks. It seems you still don't know how they are used.

Did I use single or double quotes? Go back and check if you're unsure. Now, did you use single or double quotes?

Stop a moment. Read a little about single and double quotes. This should be important to you.

 

[AV1611VET]

Yep, that's what it means.

And I'm not buying it.

I'll ask just once more, then I won't ask again (for now):

Why does Wikipedia document "atheistic evolution," but not "atheistic chemistry"?

 

[AV1611VET]

Why do most Christians believe that he was crucified on Friday?

No comment.