really what you are doing here is explaining something that doesn't exist. I, out of the goodness of my heart am giving a qualification or example for you to meet, just so you can see if your theory is valid. All you would have to do is provide something as rock solid evidence of a transitionary link, since you believe in common ancestry you believe that one animal tranitioned into another. This transition is what is silent from your studies and evidences. Provide one or 10 links, I don't care how many steps you provide. I don't care how many years it takes, but please provide proof of what you say. Macro evolution may not be between two different species, but eventually they transition across genra, whether (like i said) it takes 10 steps or 1. It doesn't matter, a transition has to have a proof of a link to both sides, when you take 10-100 steps it's impossible to prove common ancestry empiricly. This is the stuggle you have.
