Federal judge: Arguments against gay marriage 'are not those of serious people'

[Aldebaran]

Another one broken right out of the mold I see.

It's been awhile! Have you searched this thread yet to look for the answer to the question you like to repeatedly ask me? It won't hurt you to do a little homework, ya know.

 

[bhsmte]

It's been awhile! Have you searched this thread yet to look for the answer to the question you like to repeatedly ask me? It won't hurt you to do a little homework, ya know.

I would hate to have to deal with the cognitive dissonance you must experience, I'm sure it's not pleasant.

 

[Aldebaran]

I would hate to have to deal with the cognitive dissonance you must experience, I'm sure it's not pleasant.

I guess you're done asking questions. Whew! Now give me a big hug!

BTW, why didn't you answer my question? Have you searched this thread yet to look for the answer to the question you like to repeatedly ask me?

 

[PreachersWife2004]

So...how bout those arguments and that federal judge...

 

[Aldebaran]

So...how bout those arguments and that federal judge...

The what? And the who? Oh yeah, we're a bit off topic, aren't we?

Personally, I think the judge should simply stick to judging the facts of a case rather than judging the people making the arguments. Obviously, I don't agree with his decision.

 

[Skaloop]

The what? And the who? Oh yeah, we're a bit off topic, aren't we?

Personally, I think the judge should simply stick to judging the facts of a case rather than judging the people making the arguments. Obviously, I don't agree with his decision.

Which facts should the judge have stuck to? Because from what I've read, there were no facts presented by the anti-SSM side, just arguments, and those were bad arguments.

So I am really curious as to which facts you think were presented and allegedly ignored.

 

[Aldebaran]

Which facts should the judge have stuck to? Because from what I've read, there were no facts presented by the anti-SSM side, just arguments, and those were bad arguments.

So I am really curious as to which facts you think were presented and allegedly ignored.

I guess we're going to go back to arguing again, huh?

 

[Skaloop]

I guess we're going to go back to arguing again, huh?

No, we're going to discussing. I'm not arguing anything, I am asking which facts you think were ignored.

 

[Aldebaran]

No, we're going to discussing. I'm not arguing anything, I am asking which facts you think were ignored.

I think he should have ignored his thoughts that the people making the argument weren't serious.

 

[Skaloop]

I think he should have ignored his thoughts that the people making the argument weren't serious.

It's not the people making the arguments that weren't serious, it's the arguments that weren't serious.

 

[Aldebaran]

It's not the people making the arguments that weren't serious, it's the arguments that weren't serious.

Oh, ok.

 

[Cearbhall]

Personally, I think the judge should simply stick to judging the facts of a case rather than judging the people making the arguments. Obviously, I don't agree with his decision.

Yes, he judged the facts that were presented and declared that they didn't deserve to be taken seriously.

 

[Queller]

The what? And the who? Oh yeah, we're a bit off topic, aren't we?

Personally, I think the judge should simply stick to judging the facts of a case rather than judging the people making the arguments. Obviously, I don't agree with his decision.

On what Constitutional basis do you disagree with his decision?

 

[Belk]

So...how bout those arguments and that federal judge...

He found them and the religious arguments to be homogenized.

 

[poolerboy0077]

The what? And the who? Oh yeah, we're a bit off topic, aren't we?

Personally, I think the judge should simply stick to judging the facts of a case rather than judging the people making the arguments. Obviously, I don't agree with his decision.

On what Constitutional basis do you disagree with his decision?

This

 

[KCfromNC]

Technically, that would be on topic.

Guess so, in an unintentionally ironic sort of way.

 

[PreachersWife2004]

He found them and the religious arguments to be homogenized.

Gay milk!

 

[AirPo]

Gay milk!

Comes from happy cows!

 

[Cute Tink]

Gay milk!

Taste the rainbow?

 

[Belk]

Gay milk!

Was going for a pun but...