Denial of content results in the pompous holier-than-thou used Dodge.
At least VictorC I am not dodging a plain thus saith the LORD.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Denial of content results in the pompous holier-than-thou used Dodge.
You're still having trouble finding a commandment to keep the Sabbath unholy, aren't you?
That's what I told you in my very first post to you yesterday. I feel so... what's the word? ... vindicated. You have no reason to keep something noncompliant with the Law that ordained it, nor do you have any reason to rail on those of us grateful for God's redemption from the former code that estranged us apart from Him.I am glad that commandment don't exist because my God is Love and Good and requests nothing of us that is unholy!
If you keep the Sabbath it must exist.I am glad that commandment don't exist because my God is Love and Good and requests nothing of us that is unholy!
I would think that to keep it holy one would at least have to be incompliance with the stone tablets. Sadly you're not and thus don't keep it much less holy.Scratch, you didn't get the whole message, VictorC had said unholy commandment and in response I stated,
I am glad that commandment don't exist because my God is Love and Good and requests nothing of us that is unholy!
Sure I keep it and it for sure is a Holy Commandment as He is HOLY and nothing but Holy comes from Him! And oh yes it certainly does still exist and cannot and will not be changed by Him nor can any other change it or abrogate it!.
I would think that to keep it holy one would at least have to be incompliance with the stone tablets. Sadly you're not and thus don't keep it much less holy.
The Jews are still scratching their heads over that "2nd death" thang........Scratch you evidently hold to the theology that no one can keep the law and not sin.
Of that I do not agree, hear Paul on this, he reveals the mystery as to how we can!.........
You know that if we do not overcome sinning it sure don't sound good.
Hear Jesus here,
Re 2:11
He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death.
OOOWEE, what does that say for he that don't overcome his sinning?
Is that the fault of the law or the violators? It is not the fault of the speed limit that people get tickets is it?Would you be remotely suggesting its the people who stoned violators of the law rather than being told to do so by it? The law grants no mercy anywhere. Its violation always brings death in every case.
Scratch you evidently hold to the theology that no one can keep the law and not sin.
Of that I do not agree, hear Paul on this, he reveals the mystery as to how we can!
Col 1:26 Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints:
Col 1:27 To whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:
Col 1:28 Whom we preach, warning every man, and teaching every man in all wisdom; that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus:
Col 1:29 Whereunto I also labour, striving according to his working, which worketh in me mightily.
You know that if we do not overcome sinning it sure don't sound good.
Hear Jesus here,
Re 2:11 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death.[/COLOR]
OOOWEE, what does that say for he that don't overcome his sinning?
How can a fault be attributed to the law? Sin preceded it. I never said the law was the problem and have no idea why you think I've done so. You appear to think I'm attacking the law.Is that the fault of the law or the violators? It is not the fault of the speed limit that people get tickets is it?
The problem is not the law! stop making it look like it is!
How can a fault be attributed to the law? Sin preceded it. I never said the law was the problem and have no idea why you think I've done so. You appear to think I'm attacking the law.
I'm glad you can remember part of the dialog - but you left out the part where you admitted that the Sabbath you keep is unholy and noncompliant with the Law that ordained it. Contradicting yourself in this post shows the typical selective memory loss you've exercised throughout our conversation.Scratch, you didn't get the whole message, VictorC had said unholy commandment and in response I stated,
I am glad that commandment don't exist because my God is Love and Good and requests nothing of us that is unholy!
Sure I keep it and it for sure is a Holy Commandment as He is HOLY and nothing but Holy comes from Him! And oh yes it certainly does still exist and cannot and will not be changed by Him nor can any other change it or abrogate it!.
I'm glad you can remember part of the dialog - but you left out the part where you admitted that the Sabbath you keep is unholy and noncompliant with the Law that ordained it. Contradicting yourself in this post shows the typical selective memory loss you've exercised throughout our conversation.
My role here isn't to help you remember what you posted. Truth be told, you completely forgot, and quoting the Mosaic covenant once again merely condemns your pseudo-Judaic replacement of the Sabbath.I have not the least problem with REMEMBER as that is how our God has started the Fourth Commandment, AH, it is straight forward and you can remember too after reading it! <snip>
My role here isn't to help you remember what you posted. Truth be told, you completely forgot, and quoting the Mosaic covenant once again merely condemns your pseudo-Judaic replacement of the Sabbath.
Gibs, there was plenty of Scripture provided for your consideration - and in almost all cases you chose not to respond or even consider it. What you're doing in this latest episode is parroting a claim that Scripture already proved to be false, and you elected to offer no comment to it. This is similar to repeating a fallacious straw man five times in recent posts and pretending that it is valid each time. It was you who demanded our acceptance of some supposedly divine commandment to adopt your unBiblical and unholy 'sabbath', and you can't find one scrap of support from your KJV Bible for your contention.Jesus and the Father who was in Him in ALL fullness made the WAY and it seems to me you out of presumption of false application of scripture made a way that is not valid.
The unchanging Law is the same in both covenants. You may have convinced yourself that it isn't but you may as well not continue to convince me of that as there is no valid scripture to support it!
This is non trinitarian here.... Jesus doesn't have the Father in him, they may be seen as "one" in that Jesus did all the Father wanted but they are truly separate persons of the trinity.Jesus and the Father who was in Him in ALL fullness made the WAY and it seems to me you out of presumption of false application of scripture made a way that is not valid.
The unchanging Law is the same in both covenants. You may have convinced yourself that it isn't but you may as well not continue to convince me of that as there is no valid scripture to support it!