Seems some blinkers might be in place. Joshua stated:
Answer: God can be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent (what you call "omni-max"), when evil exists, simply because he has reason(s) for allowing evil to exist.
This is not a "problem" for theists. It's a pretty simple answer.
That is not an unreasonable answer, although you seem to be ignoring it, probably as it disturbs your simplistic syllogisms.
You who can't even know all about yourself, let alone another person, with complete certainty, can dismiss God having purposes He has not told us about. Really?
Soundly reasoned arguments require facts
You don't have all the facts
Therefore your arguments are not reasonable.
Or:
Reason alone based on facts is the primary arbiter of truth.
How do you 'prove' that without using reason and therefore engaging in a circular argument - reason 'proving; reason?
John
NZ
I asked Joshua the same follow up question (that would clarify his position) twice and didn't get an answer, so felt free to ignore the initial response.
Last edited:
Upvote
0