QUESTIONS:Isn't it though? Sadly, that is the standard erroneous reply to that particular question. One must also consider the source of such a foolish, and utterly false concept...the apostate Paul. His theology on why the vast majority of the Jewish people reject Jesus as the Messiah makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. He claims that Israel [conveniently, in this particular instance, the "Church" is not Israel, the Jewish people actually are] was "spiritually blinded". How strange is it that HaShem would command the Jewish people to be a light unto the nations, then supposedly render them "spiritually blind" to their own Mashiach? Not only that, but this blinding effect is suppose to somehow benefit the gentiles? Furthermore, this supposed blinding is also suppose to provoke the Jewish people to jealousy toward the gentiles?! How utterly absurd! I don't know of any Christians, or Messianics who have actually stopped and thought about the ramifications of Paul's obviously erroneous theology.
I would love for someone to explain to me how HaShem "spiritually blinding" His chosen covenant people, who possessed, maintained, and guarded the holy Torah would, or even could, be of great benefit to the gentiles? Or explain to me how this supposed spiritual blindness would aid the Jewish people in carrying out their calling to be a light unto all nations? Exactly how does this spiritual blinding supposedly provoke the Jewish people to jealousy toward non-Jews, as Paul claims it does? Time and time again I have seen the exact opposite effect on Messianics, who are jealous of the Jewish people instead, not the other way around. Many even go to great lengths to "prove" [to themselves mostly] that they are somehow Jewish. This has happened many times on this very forum.
One really needs to be very careful when reading anything Paul has written in the way of a theological treatise. He constantly contradicts himself, and they are not just perceived contradictions as some would vehemently suggest, and like us to believe.
This is absolutely true. I've done much research on the subject, and as far as I can tell, the followers of the Jesus movement all but vanished from history around the time of the destruction of the Beit HaMikdash. Most of the books one can find in an Christian bookstore on the subject of "Church history" is pure fiction, and can easily be debunked with very little research. The entity known today as the "Church" has no connection whatsoever to the earliest group(s) of the Jesus movement. The only reason they even attempt to claim an unbroken chain to begin with, is because of a single verse in the New Testament that is taken out of it's proper context. Jesus never promised an unbroken chain, so their labor is in vain.
Not odd at all if you frequently visit this forum. It happens all the time, my friend. Especially with the one whom you have addressed above.
1. Are you sure Paul's words were translated properly? Could there be a misunderstanding of what Paul said by the English translators?
2. Paul said he was a minister to the gentiles, and the other Jewish Apostles were ministers to the Jews. Are the writings of the other Apostles acceptable to our Jewish brothers?
Upvote
0