Yes ... your imagination thread pwns the Bible timeline.
(In your mind.)
Just as the bible pwns deep time in your mind. Still no difference here. What's your point?
Upvote
0
Yes ... your imagination thread pwns the Bible timeline.
(In your mind.)
Physical age - existential age = embedded age.
No AV. With the embedded age argument shows us that God wants us to believe in evolution whether real or not. You can't have it both ways.
Why an embedded age? Why a fossil record in that embedded age that demonstrates evolution?
I still want to know if AV's embedded age applies to fossils, and if so, how so. He gave us a clear timeline of creation w/ embedded age, fall, then fossils.
That's the difficult part he can't explain and I finally think he realizes the hole he has dug for himself with embedded age. I don't know why he wants to put the fossil record after the fall if it is embedded.
I still want to know if AV's embedded age applies to fossils, and if so, how so. He gave us a clear timeline of creation w/ embedded age, fall, then fossils.
Man was created in the 6th day. Jesus rose in the 8th day. So the fossils were embedded ... when God wasn't looking, as He rested on the 7th day?
I see you provided pictorial evidence of the fossils being embedded; Johnny on the spot with the evidence, you are.
Then you're quote-mining a term I use.
What is the difference between age and embedded age?
I submit that you not knowing the difference is where your problem lies.
No, thanks.Of course, if you feel you can describe it in a meaningful way, you go right ahead.
No, according to you, it is 6000 years old.
Age is what we measure. Embedded age is a fantasy you dreamt up in order to ignore the facts.
No, thanks.
Whether I can or not, it doesn't excuse this doosey of a mistake:
No, thanks.
Whether I can or not, it doesn't excuse this doosey of a mistake:
Not.Wrong.
No.Embedded age implies that a thing is really younger then it looks.
"Look like" is where you're getting confused.If Shiva creates a human being from scratch and builds it to look like a 30 year old male,
You're saying he would have an embedded age of 30 because he "looks like" he's 30, and that's not what embedded age is.... then that human would have an embedded age of 30 years, but his actual age would be just a few seconds.
You would know by subtracting his physical age (30) by his existential age (0) and the difference (30) would be his embedded age.An interesting question is "how would we know?".
That would be Last Thursdaysim.Suppose that a god created everything in current form only 10 minutes ago with embedded age and with all are memories embedded in our brains... how could we ever know?
And you forfeited your reasoning skills with this post.How do you know?
Ow, that's right.... you forfaited your reasoning skills with that sentence in your signature. You just assume and consider it real. Right....
Yes, mistake.Mistake?
This 4.57 billion year old earth has orbited the sun about 6000 times.About How. Any times has the Earth orbited the Sun?
Yes, mistake.
This 4.57 billion year old earth has orbited the sun about 6000 times.
I create two rocks ex nihilo. I create one with two million years of embedded age and the other with none.
When you study them, your analysis shows that one rock is new and the other rock is old, despite the fact they are both the same age.
Am I being deceptive in making it look like one rock is older than the other?
Really? "Age is what we measure"? I thought "they" measured isotope ratios.
Age is something that is assumed based on starting ratios that are also assumed.
If I was a Day Ager, instead of an Embedded Ager, and believed that the days in Genesis 1 were eons of time, I would say the earth was created six eons ago, but has only gone around the sun two eons, since the sun wasn't created until the fourth eon.Doesn't it have embedded orbits then?