That's boys. These are girls in boys bodies. It's literally a female brain in the wrong body.
@night, good for you, accepting defeat. Total and utter defeat.
@night, good for you, accepting defeat. Total and utter defeat.
Upvote
0
It is possible for same sex children to peek too.
No. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying other little boys may feel the urge to peek under the stall because they know what is on the other side: a little girl in the boys bathroom.
It's a bit difficult to determine the gender of a child's brain by looking at him or her. Let them tell you.First, tell them that boys can only use the boys bathroom and girls can only us the girls bathroom. Then explain to them which gender they are. If they are confused, we should not let them continue to be confused.
No, not all children. Just the ones who decide they want to use the other bathrooms because of how they feel regardless of what reproductive organs they have.
No, not all children. Just the ones who decide they want to use the other bathrooms because of how they feel regardless of what reproductive organs they have.
I think you need to do a bit of research on fetal development and the science of intersex and transgender individuals. No person's sex is determined solely by reproductive organs.No, not all children. Just the ones who decide they want to use the other bathrooms because of how they feel regardless of what reproductive organs they have.
Little girls could peek too. Did you often peek on your sisters? Is that why you assume boys like to peek? Did your parents tell you that your bodies were bad and dirty, and you shouldn't know what your sister looked like?
I knew girls have vagina and boy have a penis before kindergarten.
No. I never peeked at my my sisters. No, my parents never told me my body was bad and dirty. I know you would like to think it though.
What promoted the former laws that separated the sexes when they used public facilities? Bathrooms, gym showers, locker rooms, etc...
Mach's Law
Mach's Law: As an online political discussion grows longer, the probability that someone will evoke charges of racism approaches 1 (100%)
MachZer0 said:Mach's Law: As an online political discussion grows longer, the probability that someone will evoke charges of racism approaches 1 (100%)
It's a self fulfilling prophecy. When you advocate or condemn a policy for reasons born out of ignorance and bigotry, it's likely you'll be compared to others who have done the same thing.
Mach's Law: As an online political discussion grows longer, the probability that someone will evoke charges of racism approaches 1 (100%)
Mach's Law extends beyond discussions of homosexual marriage. Now let's try to stay on topicIt's a self fulfilling prophecy. When you advocate or condemn a policy for reasons born out of ignorance and bigotry, it's likely you'll be compared to others who have done the same thing.