• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

What Would Falsify the Flood? (2)

Black Akuma

Shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die...
Dec 8, 2013
1,109
15
✟23,844.00
Faith
Seeker
Seriously?

Free will is the ability of agents to make choices unconstrained by certain factors. Factors of historical concern have included metaphysical constraints (such as logical, nomological, or theological determinism), physical constraints (such as chains or imprisonment), social constraints (such as threat of punishment or censure), and mental constraints (such as compulsions or phobias, neurological disorders, or genetic predispositions). The principle of free will has religious, legal, ethical, and scientific implications.[1] For example, in the religious realm, free will implies that individual will and choices can coexist with an omnipotent divinity. In the law, it affects considerations of punishment and rehabilitation.

Yes, I understand the concept of free will. What I'm asking is why, exactly, free will is a 'good' thing.
 
Upvote 0

46AND2

Forty six and two are just ahead of me...
Sep 5, 2012
5,807
2,210
Vancouver, WA
✟109,603.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Apparently you prefer to have a puppet existence with no free will.

We are capable of refraining from sinning. And if we do slip up, there's always the fact the GOD HIMSELF became one of us and died a horrible death so you could have all your sins removed forever.

What more do you want?

Even more things that make no logical sense. You're really knocking them out of the ballpark, today....

I can think of no better example of a "puppet existence" than to have been created by an omnipotent, omniscient creator. Literally everything you do would be exactly as he created you to do it.

If nobody can live a perfect life, then we are not capable of refraining from sinning.

How is it possible for an eternal god to die a horrible death? He is eternal. Not dying is kind of the point.

What more do I want? I want things to make sense. Your version of God does not make sense.
 
Upvote 0

Atheos canadensis

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2013
1,383
132
✟29,901.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Depends on what your definition of "torment" is. If you think God or some demon is going to constantly torment you in hell, that is not the case. Suffice it to say that I don't think anyone would choose to be there.

I agree. But so far your definition of torment seems to be a separation from God. You seem to be unwilling to clarify whether there is any actual physical torment such as physical confinement. So for the purpose of answering my question of why I as an atheist should fear your Hell it does not suffice to say you don't think anyone would choose to be there. So far I have no reason to fear it because you aren't willing to directly state whether there is physical torment or not. Why is this so hard?
 
Upvote 0

EternalDragon

Counselor
Jul 31, 2013
5,757
26
✟28,767.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Even more things that make no logical sense. You're really knocking them out of the ballpark, today....

I can think of no better example of a "puppet existence" than to have been created by an omnipotent, omniscient creator. Literally everything you do would be exactly as he created you to do it.

If nobody can live a perfect life, then we are not capable of refraining from sinning.

How is it possible for an eternal god to die a horrible death? He is eternal. Not dying is kind of the point.

What more do I want? I want things to make sense. Your version of God does not make sense.

That's because you have the wrong ideas about my God. If we aren't capable of refraining from sinning then why isn't everyone killing each other?

Everyone has free will.

It is not possible for an eternal God to die. But if he became human like us then he could die. Which he did.
 
Upvote 0

EternalDragon

Counselor
Jul 31, 2013
5,757
26
✟28,767.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
I agree. But so far your definition of torment seems to be a separation from God. You seem to be unwilling to clarify whether there is any actual physical torment such as physical confinement. So for the purpose of answering my question of why I as an atheist should fear your Hell it does not suffice to say you don't think anyone would choose to be there. So far I have no reason to fear it because you aren't willing to directly state whether there is physical torment or not. Why is this so hard?

It's not hard at all. Maybe you missed it. Post #147 pretty much sums it up.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,317
52,683
Guam
✟5,166,304.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If someone is going to claim that the evidence supports a recent global flood then they must also be prepared to show how a recent global flood is falsifiable. IOW, if any possible observation supports the flood, then no observation supports the flood. The flood needs to be falsifiable in order for people to claim that they have evidence that supports it.

Therefore, the question is simple and mainly aimed at YEC's who claim that a recent global flood is supported by the evidence. What features would a geologic feature need in order to falsify a recent global flood?
If the Flood hasn't occurred yet, and is still pending, we should see an ocean of water embedded in the earth.

You've heard of the "seven seas"?

This would be the eighth.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
If the Flood hasn't occurred yet, and is still pending, we should see an ocean of water embedded in the earth.

You've heard of the "seven seas"?

This would be the eighth.

And the Flood hasn't happened and is not pending, what should we expect to see?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,317
52,683
Guam
✟5,166,304.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
And the Flood hasn't happened and is not pending, what should we expect to see?
If the Flood hasn't occurred yet, and is not pending, we should see an ocean of water embedded in the earth.

You've heard of the "seven seas"?

This would be the eighth.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
If the Flood hasn't occurred yet, and is not pending, we should see an ocean of water embedded in the earth.

You've heard of the "seven seas"?

This would be the eighth

Why?
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Why what?

Why are the conditions for an imminent flood identical for the conditions for no imminent one?

And why are you assuming an embedded ocean exists?
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
:scratch: ... What?

Who said I assume an embedded ocean exists?

Well, you said it'd be there if there were a flood, and you said it'd be there if there wasn't -- you got a third option?
 
Upvote 0

Atheos canadensis

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2013
1,383
132
✟29,901.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
It's not hard at all. Maybe you missed it. Post #147 pretty much sums it up.

So it is a place of physical torment:

for I am tormented in this flame

This seems to be describing fiery torment, so why did you get so huffy when that was brought up, and why did you say this?

I am sure those people are tormented but not actual "tormented".

Are you having trouble remembering what Hell is supposed to be like?
If the latter quote is your real belief of Hell, I have nothing to fear. If the former quote is the true nature of Hell then it is disingenuous to claim that you're giving your children a balanced view of the issue and letting them choose freely when you are telling them that if they don't choose the same as you they are sent to a place to be tormented in flame for eternity.

So which is it? Is it being "tormented in this flame" or "not actual 'tormented'"?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,317
52,683
Guam
✟5,166,304.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well, you said it'd be there if there were a flood, and you said it'd be there if there wasn't -- you got a third option?

Um .... it's not there?

Did that idea come to your mind?
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What Would Falsify the Flood?

Nothing, if it didn't happen how can we falsify it?
More importantly if it did happen how could you falsify it? More to the point, how could science falsify it? Falsification is only as good as man's ability to verify. In other words, pretending the little concept should fit God and His works of old, is just man's pride.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Um .... it's not there?

Did that idea come to your mind?

Of course it's not there -- which makes your entire hypothetical useless.

of course, it could be that you're trying to be clever by implying that the lack of an underground ocean means there was a Flood -- but you'd never dream of failing that badly.

So, assuming you have a point, what is it?
 
Upvote 0