Dave Ellis
Contributor
- Dec 27, 2011
- 8,933
- 821
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- CA-Conservatives
Upvote
0
Then what, specifically is the nature and amount of the difference in CSI levels between this structure:
Sphinx In Egypt Royalty Free Stock Photo - Image: 13868805
and this structure:
Sphinx (Romania) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
?
No. Because CSI has never been scientifically defined in any quantifiable way.
No. Because CSI has never been scientifically defined in any quantifiable way.
Abiogenesis
and you know every single peer review institution in america do you? nnice!
I actually read it yes, you,
do I have to do everything?
what you can't read?
prove there is absolutely no evolution within abiogenesis.
what is abiogenesis without evolution?
The biological definition is not applied to stone structures.
"composed of several well-matched, interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning".http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity#cite_note-5
here is one
evidence of design in bird wings:
Evidence Of Design In Bird Feathers And Avian Respiration
prove there is absolutely no evolution within abiogenesis.
furthermore, what mechanism must be achieved for an organism, cell, amoeba, etc to be matured for abiogenesis to stop and furthermore for evolution to start?
I await your response.
Because evolution and abiogenesis are two totally separate things... You may as well be asking me to prove there's no biology in nuclear physics. It's a nonsensical request.
.
How does this support Intelligent Design? What experiments did they do to test ID hypotheses? What was their null hypothesis?
Once you have evolution you have life, so there can't be abiogenesis. Once you have an imperfect replicator that can compete for limited resources you have reached the end of abiogenesis and the beginning of evolution.
what mechanism prohibits abiogenesis at a certain point and enables evolution?
abiogenesis relies on evolution as it's primary engine.
prove me wrong.
How is that evidence for design? If we take away parts until something no longer works, how does this prove design? Why wouldn't evolved systems have the same properties?