Evidence for Design (3)

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
Show me something that is written in two languages, on top of each other, that can be read simultaneously and understood by two different interpreters at the same time and show me how this was formulated before hand with no knowledge it would be needed as thus, by unintelligent agents, and then we can move forward.

DNA is not written or interpretted. Those are metaphors.

Or is this another "We don't know yet because evolutiondidit" answers?

We do know. We have the fossil and DNA evidence that species share a common ancestor and they changed over time through the mechanisms of evolution.
 
Upvote 0

EternalDragon

Counselor
Jul 31, 2013
5,757
26
✟21,267.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
DNA is not written or interpretted. Those are metaphors.



We do know. We have the fossil and DNA evidence that species share a common ancestor and they changed over time through the mechanisms of evolution.

So it is your contention that natural forces wrote the genome languages and a way to interpret them to make proteins, in advance and with foreknowledge? Or that nothing wrote the language and it just appeared there over time?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
So it is your contention that natural forces wrote the genome languages and a way to interpret them to make proteins, in advance and with foreknowledge? Or that nothing wrote the language and it just appeared there over time?

I am saying that nothing literally wrote a language. Those are metaphors. DNA is not a realy language, and DNA is not literally read or wrote.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
14,681
5,240
✟302,097.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
So it is your contention that natural forces wrote the genome languages and a way to interpret them to make proteins, in advance and with foreknowledge? Or that nothing wrote the language and it just appeared there over time?
Who says it required foreknowledge?

A bunch of things happened, and those things that were able to make more copies of themselves did so.
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
8,649
9,619
✟240,815.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
So it is your contention that natural forces wrote the genome languages and a way to interpret them to make proteins, in advance and with foreknowledge?
These attributes and functionalities evolved through the action of natural forces. No foreknowledge was, or could be, involved.
(Hint: it's not rocket science.)
 
Upvote 0