J
Joshua0
Guest
I did not post that. You posted that link, not me.Why did you lie and post an attribution to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I did not post that. You posted that link, not me.Why did you lie and post an attribution to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
You're the only person I've met in a long time who lies about lying. I should go back and accumulate a list, only that would mean reading your posts again.I have NEVER "said that specific miracles in the Bible were false." I have never denied ANY miracle in the Bible.
see all this proves the untrustworthyness of the dating method. You claim that the samples must be "pure" and free of zenoliths (intrusions of older rock), however there are no "pure" lava flows. The parent and daughter isotopes present fluctuates throughout an eruption, so technically the date changes. the early flow may have more iron, and the later flows may have more magnesium for example, thus altering the date entirely (parent and daughter isotope fluctiation).
check out more here:
from the university of north carolina at chapel hill:
https://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/dating2.html
That is what the Bible says:Then you need to supply evidence for a global flood 65 million years ago.
Noah's flood is a shadow of the flood that destroyed the world back at the time of the dinosaurs. Before Satan had been thrown down to the Earth there was no violence in the earth. Then Satan corrupted the earth and the animals began to bite and devour one another.
I do not know who posted the link. I clicked on the link and I found a quote from a college text book.Who posted what?
The problem with Gen 1:1 is the *. That is the word that is NOT translated that talks about the relationship between God and His Creation. It really takes the rest of the Bible to explain that *, or the relationship between Creation and Creator.Genesis 1:1, then immediately go to Jude.
The problem with Gen 1:1 is the *. That is the word that is NOT translated that talks about the relationship between God and His Creation. It really takes the rest of the Bible to explain that *, or the relationship between Creation and Creator.
1:1 In the beginning God created * the heaven and the earth.
I am aware that the earth has a 4.5 billion year history. But we are just talking about the last 64 million years right now. The point in time when Creation began to bite and devour itself. I am sure that at some point in time I will need to get in and study what your talking about. It is a lot more easy to study the last 12,900 years, then it is to study the last 4.5 billion years. A lot has taken place in the history of this earth.Does this mean that there have been several world-wide floods initiated by the bible god to break up the continents?
Where does Jude tell us why God brought the universe into being? Jude does talk about how: "the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day." So we do see God has a plan to restore the universe. The battle right now is mostly here on the Earth. This is a time of testing to see who will follow the angels in their rebellion and who will remain faithful to God. To maintain holiness and purity before Him.I take it to mean that God brought the universe into being miraculously by the word of His power. What interests me is why he did so. For that you read Jude.
In verse 5 we read: "The earth is defiled by its people; they have disobeyed the laws, violated the statutes and broken the everlasting covenant." Because they have broken their covenant with God, the Earth is broken. Then in vs 19 we read: "The earth is broken up, the earth is split asunder, the earth is violently shaken."The earth was split in half?
Who posted what?
Instead of trying to deceive readers into thinking that these ideas come with the authority of "the university of north carolina at chapel hill" [sic], why don't you simply admit to readers that you are quoting a computer science professor there who happens to post his creationist geology nonsense on the university website? His personal opinions about a topic unrelated to his teaching duties there are in NO WAY reflective of the university.
Your dishonesty continues to amaze me! And as a follower of Christ, I'm saddened that you so continually endeavor to associate such tactics with an alleged Christian agenda.
I'm always amazed when young earth creationists tell me that this is OBVIOUSLY a "proof" of Noah's Flood. But I would really like to know if that sounds like "common sense" to anyone.
I've also wondered this: Does it seem likely that a FLOOD would leave behind the same kind of environment as an ancient ocean or lake?
Also, if these observation and evidence are "obvious", why are young earth creationists never able to use that evidence to identify THE GEOLOGIC STRATA OF THE GLOBAL FLOOD? That is, if the flood evidence is easy to see, why can't the strata location be named so that I know where I can find the flood evidence wherever I happen to be in the world?
In what translation is that, because I can't find anything like it in the book of Jude.In verse 5 we read: "The earth is defiled by its people; they have disobeyed the laws, violated the statutes and broken the everlasting covenant." Because they have broken their covenant with God, the Earth is broken. Then in vs 19 we read: "The earth is broken up, the earth is split asunder, the earth is violently shaken."
In verse 5 we read: "The earth is defiled by its people; they have disobeyed the laws, violated the statutes and broken the everlasting covenant." Because they have broken their covenant with God, the Earth is broken. Then in vs 19 we read: "The earth is broken up, the earth is split asunder, the earth is violently shaken."
The science of Geology began as a study of the Earth to understand just what this means that "the earth is broken up". Plate Tectonics began as a theory to explain this. Even though Plate Tectonics began as a Creationist theory, over the years plate tectonics has been widely accepted by Science. Of course minor details are still being worked out. Still this is a very well established and accepted theory at this point in time. Evolutionist and Creationist both accept plate tectonics.