I saw a post by someone saying the tithers haven't produced any scripture, so here you go.
Here's a list of as various tithes (10%) I found so far. The ones with * are the scriptures NT tithers base their faith tithing on.
NON-LAW
*Abraham tithes (10%) on something he won. Hebrews 7:2, Genesis 14:20
He won? You make it sound like it was a game show.
Are you telling us you believe it was Abram's intent to keep what he knew was not his from the beginning...to keep property he knew belonged to someone else? If so, on what solid foundation are you basing that assumption?
Are you telling us you personally would retrieve property you knew belonged to someone else, and that you would keep it as what you had "won," even if you had to fight and defeat someone for it? That's the immoral grounding you stand upon?
I ask that because Abram made it abundantly clear that his intent was to retrieve his nephew, not acquire loot and servants.
Where did Israel ever follow Abraham's example of tithing from the spoils of war? If he established some sort of principle, where do we see Israel, his offspring, following that example from the spoils of war?
How does tithing from spoils of war translate over into wages earned as an EXCHANGE for one's labor and skills as a matter of survival? I don't see the connection. Perhaps you could explain it?
*Jacob tithes (10%) of all the Lord gives him. Genesis 28:22
You consider Jacob an example for tithing? Where does it say he ever followed through with his promise?
How do you fit into your regiment of belief those elements about Jacob's tithe that are....less than admirable? Do you lay down expectations and requirements the Lord must meet before you tithe, or do you just do so on the basis of feelings and emotions about the subject?
How do you know Jacob ever fulfilled what he promised as an ongoing practice? How did He give it to God, as if God needed it?
*NT tithe (10%) of all that you possess. Luke 18:12
Can you explain to us how a claim of obedience to tithing from all his increase from his garden, which the Law required, has anything to do with us today?
If you're going to point at Jesus' acceptance of obedience to the Law as something that automatically translates Lawful elements to us today, then what will you do about Luke 5:14 where He told the man to offer up the burnt sacrifices
ALSO required by the Law? Do you offer up such in obedience to what the Lord told him to do under the Law, as with the tithe?
*NT Pharisee tithe 10% and Christ said to continue doing it. Matthew 23:23
The NT covenant had not yet been established, so what do you mean by saying they're NT? The cup of the New Covenant was passed to mankind LONG AFTER that discussion with the pharisees, so by what authority could anyone move that line of distinction away from the authority of Christ Jesus?
*Honor the Lord with all your possession. Proverbs 3:9
That's indeed an encouragement to adhere to what the Law commanded of those who received increase from fields, orchards, vineyards, flocks and herds. Can you show where the wages of wage earners was EVER a consideration in the system of tithing? Can you show us where even fishermen were required to tithe? Got anything to say along that line?
*NT tithing through Christ. Hebrews 6:20 and Hebrews 7:1-28
You've ignored the short dissertation I provided in post 545 about your misuse of Hebrews, and you offered no rebuttal to it, so this one is meaningless until you provide something to back up your misuse of that book.
LAW
*Lay aside a tithe of your increase for the Levite and the poor. Remove it from your house and give it. Deuteronomy 26:12-13
Can you show us where that instruction within the Law, BASED upon the the Law-ful definition of the tithe, had anything to do with the wages of wage earners, such as you and me? If not, then the use of this and all other references based in the Law fall flat, as well as the parallels between Abram's tithe from spoils of war and us.
*Tithe (10%) is holy to the Lord. Leviticus 27:30
*The Israelites brought a tithe of everything, including produce. 2 Chronicles 31:5
1st tithe to support those doing the Lord's work. Leviticus 27:30, Numbers 8
2nd tithe to take family on yearly feast in God's presence. Deuteronomy 14:22-27
3rd tithe is the 2 year poor tithe to look after the poor. Deuteronomy 14:28-29
Tithe of the produce of the land to the Levites. Nehemiah 10:37
Tithe of the tithe to the storehouse by the Levites. Nehemiah 10:38
Malachi tithe into the storehouse. Malachi 3:10
These are all fine examples of the Law, as you pointed out, and its requirements of those who were under the Law, and who were required to tithe ONLY from the increase from the fields, orchards, vineyards, flocks and herds. You still haven't produced anything in relation to the wages of wage earners.
There's no command from God or Christ to stop tithing.
Given that the tithe was tied directly to the Levites and the tabernacle, or temple, and that the veil was ripped by the Hand of God from top to bottom, thus illegitimizing the temple and the Levitical priesthood, there's nothing left to which to tie the tithe requirement. Considering how much mention made about tithing throughout the OT, and the lack of any supporting command from any of the apostles, I'd say you're doing nothing less than trying to prove something from silence.
It's one thing to point at a slew of verses ripped from their contexts as alleged proof for tithing today under the Law, but quite another to build your case by way of explaining your use of those verses as applying to us today.
Are you willing to support your use of those verses with explanations for each, and answering the questions asked of you?
For those who assume the anti-required-tithe position is nothing more than a matter of NOT giving,
get a life!
If such people's reading comprehension skills are so under-developed that they can't comprehend otherwise, then perhaps they should go back to grammar school and learn to read what others have actually stated. At no time have I ever said or implied cheerful giving is not a standing principle. My premises and conclusions have always been based upon giving, first and foremost, in the direction exemplified by scripture, and to do so based upon whatever amount one purposes in his mind and heart, just as the scriptures instruct. Those who accuse otherwise are by nature and trade NOT bastions of TRUTH and intellectual honesty.
BTW