KWCrazy
Newbie
- Apr 13, 2009
- 7,229
- 1,993
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Why do evolution believers hate questions they can’t answer?
How did life originate? Creation answers this. Evolutionists cannot answer this, so they proclaim that evolution doesn’t concern itself with the origination of first life, only of subsequent life. If you can’t answer the question of origination, then you can’t remove God out of the equation. God created man in His image, but evolutionists want to return the favor.
How did the DNA code originate? Creation answers this. Evolutionists cannot answer this either, so they change the definition of their religion (yes, religion) to state that they are not concerned with origination only all subsequent life. Then they puff out their chests and say “you don’t understand evolution.” We understand a lie when we see one.
How could mutations create the huge volumes of information in the DNA of living things? The simple answer is that they can’t. While mutations are considered the magical mystery force driving all evolution, benevolent mutations have never been shown to advance a species nor to encode any genetic information that didn’t previously exist. Other than a change of diet in bacteria, no evidence of evolution has ever been observed, tested or replicated. In short, there is nothing remotely scientific about it.
Why is natural selection….taught as ‘evolution’, as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life? In their religion everything is evolution. Everything which validates evolution proves evolution and everything which invalidates evolution proves evolution. Everything in biology proves that adaptation is a conservative process and does not include the fabrication of genetic information. Therefore since it invalidates claims of evolution, it proves evolution.
How did new biochemical pathways originate? Simply put, if it can happen it is self explanatory. If it can’t happen, it requires millions of years. Every time they meet with an impossibility of reason, evolutionists simply increase the age of everything.
Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed? Exactly the same way that bird evolution came about; someone saw an artist’s picture of a dinosaur and an artist’s of a chicken and concluded that they looked alike. Therefore, it became science.
How did multi-cellular life originate? Nothing ever originated. Everything always was. It just got more complex as time went on. Original single cell organisms were actually multi-celled organisms sharing a room to save on expenses.
How did cells adapted to individual survival ‘learn’ to cooperate and specialize to create complex plants and animals? In the beginning was Frankencell, which didn’t need to originate because that’s outside of the “science” of evolution. Then it went through the Magical Mutation Tour and morphed into all living things. If this is impossible, add one billion years until it IS possible.
How did sex originate? Two cells were hanging out at a local sand bar, drinking and munching plankton. One thing led to another, and before you know it, BAM! One cell produce sperm and the other didn’t have government funded birth control.
Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing? True, the fossil record shows many living things that lived and died without apparent predecessors or descendants, but evolutionists have proclaimed that all fossils are transitional. We’re only missing 99% of them because they are rare. It’s entirely possible that YEC’s stole them all.
How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame? Obviously, they are conservative and refuse to accept any genetic make-up but their own.
How did blind chemistry create mind/ intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality? It didn’t. Altruism and morality are maladaptive behaviors conditioned into us through years of the degenerative weakening of the human spirit. Soon humans will be too weak to murder their unborn, and the human race will die off.
Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated? When you lack the facts, sometimes it’s best to simply speak in multi-syllable words you don’t comprehend and state that your rival is poorly educated and simply doesn’t understand science. Evolution is the antithesis of science, but the embodiment of pomposity.
Science involves experimenting to figure out how things work; how they operate. Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as this operational science? Evolution is not about science or biology; it’s about the denial of God. Given its true motive, the details are meaningless. When it comes to religion, evolutionists say, “That miracle could not have happened, so therefore it did not happen.” When it comes to impossible claims of evolution, they say “You just don’t understand evolution. When in doubt, lie.
Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes? Michael Ruse, evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.” Heck, I don’t think I can top that!
How did life originate? Creation answers this. Evolutionists cannot answer this, so they proclaim that evolution doesn’t concern itself with the origination of first life, only of subsequent life. If you can’t answer the question of origination, then you can’t remove God out of the equation. God created man in His image, but evolutionists want to return the favor.
How did the DNA code originate? Creation answers this. Evolutionists cannot answer this either, so they change the definition of their religion (yes, religion) to state that they are not concerned with origination only all subsequent life. Then they puff out their chests and say “you don’t understand evolution.” We understand a lie when we see one.
How could mutations create the huge volumes of information in the DNA of living things? The simple answer is that they can’t. While mutations are considered the magical mystery force driving all evolution, benevolent mutations have never been shown to advance a species nor to encode any genetic information that didn’t previously exist. Other than a change of diet in bacteria, no evidence of evolution has ever been observed, tested or replicated. In short, there is nothing remotely scientific about it.
Why is natural selection….taught as ‘evolution’, as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life? In their religion everything is evolution. Everything which validates evolution proves evolution and everything which invalidates evolution proves evolution. Everything in biology proves that adaptation is a conservative process and does not include the fabrication of genetic information. Therefore since it invalidates claims of evolution, it proves evolution.
How did new biochemical pathways originate? Simply put, if it can happen it is self explanatory. If it can’t happen, it requires millions of years. Every time they meet with an impossibility of reason, evolutionists simply increase the age of everything.
Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed? Exactly the same way that bird evolution came about; someone saw an artist’s picture of a dinosaur and an artist’s of a chicken and concluded that they looked alike. Therefore, it became science.
How did multi-cellular life originate? Nothing ever originated. Everything always was. It just got more complex as time went on. Original single cell organisms were actually multi-celled organisms sharing a room to save on expenses.
How did cells adapted to individual survival ‘learn’ to cooperate and specialize to create complex plants and animals? In the beginning was Frankencell, which didn’t need to originate because that’s outside of the “science” of evolution. Then it went through the Magical Mutation Tour and morphed into all living things. If this is impossible, add one billion years until it IS possible.
How did sex originate? Two cells were hanging out at a local sand bar, drinking and munching plankton. One thing led to another, and before you know it, BAM! One cell produce sperm and the other didn’t have government funded birth control.
Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing? True, the fossil record shows many living things that lived and died without apparent predecessors or descendants, but evolutionists have proclaimed that all fossils are transitional. We’re only missing 99% of them because they are rare. It’s entirely possible that YEC’s stole them all.
How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame? Obviously, they are conservative and refuse to accept any genetic make-up but their own.
How did blind chemistry create mind/ intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality? It didn’t. Altruism and morality are maladaptive behaviors conditioned into us through years of the degenerative weakening of the human spirit. Soon humans will be too weak to murder their unborn, and the human race will die off.
Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated? When you lack the facts, sometimes it’s best to simply speak in multi-syllable words you don’t comprehend and state that your rival is poorly educated and simply doesn’t understand science. Evolution is the antithesis of science, but the embodiment of pomposity.
Science involves experimenting to figure out how things work; how they operate. Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as this operational science? Evolution is not about science or biology; it’s about the denial of God. Given its true motive, the details are meaningless. When it comes to religion, evolutionists say, “That miracle could not have happened, so therefore it did not happen.” When it comes to impossible claims of evolution, they say “You just don’t understand evolution. When in doubt, lie.
Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes? Michael Ruse, evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.” Heck, I don’t think I can top that!
Upvote
0
