• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Democrat vs Republican

T

Thekla

Guest
Easy G (G²);61456950 said:
It would have been beneficial for the U.S to back the president when he was noting the wisdom of finding ways to switch to alternative energy/green economy as a means of increasing production...

It seems we are no longer the country of innovation and entrepreneurship - we're stodgy global has-beens.

As has been noted, corporations are in fact competition and risk-averse (the opposite of the US capitalism mythology). Real capitalists are moving forward in green energy, and as with most new tech - are receiving govt. support.

The US ? still giving 16 billion a year to the oil sector (and tax breaks on top of that) ...
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟209,750.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
It seems we are no longer the country of innovation and entrepreneurship - we're stodgy global has-beens.

As has been noted, corporations are in fact competition and risk-averse (the opposite of the US capitalism mythology). Real capitalists are moving forward in green energy, and as with most new tech - are receiving govt. support.

The US ? still giving 16 billion a year to the oil sector (and tax breaks on top of that) ...
There are many within the country who need to be considered when it comes to the issue of innovation in the global market place (i.e. Will Allen whom the First Lady worked with in the campaign to address obesity and find ways of sustainable development--more here, here or here, Majora Carter, Van Jons, etc).



GREEN JOBS NOT JAILS - The Third Wave of Environmentalism
The Green Collar Economy - Van Jones of the Center for ...
Will Allen Keynote, Shared Tables Symposium, 2/29/12
Growing Power Weekend - Urban Farming for Food Security
You Can Grow Food in the Snow - A Visit to Will Allen's Growing Power

It often seems that for many people who grow up in certain areas innovation is a must for survival--but for others who've never seen things work in action up close/personal, it's always a matter of thinking it won't work. Because the U.S has failed to learn from its mistakes when it didn't listen to the real capitalists who were wanting to invest in alternative energy (George Washington Carver being one amongst many who saw way in advance the reality of Big Oil being an issue), it won't be surprising that we keep falling further and further behind......and yet continue to keep blaming the President for the foolishness of others who refuse to see good opportunities to help. If alive toda, George Washington Carver would sadly not be considered even when he was decades ahead of his time when it came to things such as ethanol based on corn syrup---and as he already revolutionized the agriculture of the South/saved it and even made inventions used in car doors via plants, and encouraged others to look into industrial uses from agriculture and biotechnology. Because others already have the resources to make fuel from algae--with 5 companies already using it....and others have been finding ways to do well with all of the trash/waste we make, it's odd to see how much the U.S often seems to make excuses for why things can't be done.

As said elsewhere, it may never change so long as Big Buisnesses with oil/traditional energy sources keep up the mantra that alternative cannot be invested in without financial damage and unsustainabiltiy (despite where the traditional is already running out and has been shown to always be damaging long term). I really wish people would support him more in what it is he was trying to do with Green-Collar" jobs and keeping jobs here locally....
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
Easy G (G²);61457069 said:
There are many within the country who need to be considered when it comes to the issue of innovation in the global market place (i.e. Will Allen whom the First Lady worked with in the campaign to address obesity, Majora Carter, Van Jons, etc). It often seems that for many people who grow up in certain areas innovation is a must for survival--but for others who've never seen things work in action up close/personal, it's always a matter of thinking it won't work. Because the U.S has failed to learn from its mistakes when it didn't listen to the real capitalists who were wanting to invest in alternative energy (George Washington Carver being one amongst many who saw way in advance the reality of Big Oil being an issue), it won't be surprising that we keep falling further and further behind......and yet continue to keep blaming the President for the foolishness of others who refuse to see good opportunities to help.

I really wish people would support him more in what it is he was trying to do with Green-Collar" jobs and keeping jobs here locally....

And this, imo, is where $ in politics takes us - the old guard in business is interested in maintaining their position (which is understandable) and influences political decisions through various means.

How many oil companies are interested in shifting the focus on global warming to who caused it (rather than the what is of it) whilst waiting for the perma-frost to recede sufficiently to gain access for drilling ?

We could have jumped into solar in the 80s - and didn't. Had we, who knows what our present position in global sales would be ...
 
Upvote 0

RedPaddy

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2012
2,527
79
✟3,110.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It seems we are no longer the country of innovation and entrepreneurship - we're stodgy global has-beens.

As has been noted, corporations are in fact competition and risk-averse (the opposite of the US capitalism mythology). Real capitalists are moving forward in green energy, and as with most new tech - are receiving govt. support.

The US ? still giving 16 billion a year to the oil sector (and tax breaks on top of that) ...
By "giving" you mean "not taking in the form of taxes", right?

The failure in that train of thought is that the money belongs to the Govt. when in fact it belongs to the earner.
 
Upvote 0

RedPaddy

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2012
2,527
79
✟3,110.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That is not the whole of the issue; how's the US govt. giving 16 billion$ a year to big oil vs. a town in Bavaria supplying all its energy needs and selling back onto the grid for 5.7 million$ a year working for us ?
What regulations does Bolivia place on its businesses as oposed to the myriad list the US gov imposes on our businesses? Feel free to include healthcare mandates, insurance coverage, environmental regs, etc.
 
Upvote 0

RedPaddy

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2012
2,527
79
✟3,110.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
We could have jumped into solar in the 80s - and didn't. Had we, who knows what our present position in global sales would be ...
It wasn't cost effective at the time. Without govt subsidies, which you continually oppose, it still isn't.
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
By "giving" you mean "not taking in the form of taxes", right?

The failure in that train of thought is that the money belongs to the Govt. when in fact it belongs to the earner.

No - as the CATO Institute pointed out, the 16 billion is in govt. giveaways. They figure tax breaks (about 22 billion) as a separate phenomenon.

As an aside - I don't know what money you use, but the coins I have belong to the US govt. and the bills belong to the Federal Reserve - says so right on the bill.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟209,750.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
And this, imo, is where $ in politics takes us - the old guard in business is interested in maintaining their position (which is understandable) and influences political decisions through various means.
Propoganda comes into play here as well whenever it comes to that which is different. I'm reminded of what happened when people once railed that it was impossible to ever see men fly, until the Wright brothers, Orville (August 19, 1871 – January 30, 1948) and Wilbur (April 16, 1867 – May 30, 1912), did what they did as aviation pioneers credited with inventing and building the world's first successful airplane and making a new industry.

For others saying it was a foolish investment to work with what they did, now it is something where people look back and don't even question that travel by air is practical...and would look with raised eyebrows at others saying it shouldn't of been invested in :)

How many oil companies are interested in shifting the focus on global warming to who caused it (rather than the what is of it) whilst waiting for the perma-frost to recede sufficiently to gain access for drilling ?
Indeed..
We could have jumped into solar in the 80s - and didn't. Had we, who knows what our present position in global sales would be ...
Missed opportunities are always a pity...
 
Upvote 0

SepiaAndDust

There's a FISH in the percolator
May 6, 2012
4,380
1,325
58
Mid-America
✟34,046.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
As an aside - I don't know what money you use, but the coins I have belong to the US govt. and the bills belong to the Federal Reserve - says so right on the bill.

Please. The currency may belong to them, but the money doesn't.
 
Upvote 0

RedPaddy

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2012
2,527
79
✟3,110.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No - as the CATO Institute pointed out, the 16 billion is in govt. giveaways. They figure tax breaks (about 22 billion) as a separate phenomenon.

As an aside - I don't know what money you use, but the coins I have belong to the US govt. and the bills belong to the Federal Reserve - says so right on the bill.
no, the money I receive as compensation for my time, efforts, etc in the form aof a paycheck is mine. The physical coin is perhaps the physical property of the fed, but the value is the property of the earner.

As to the govt giveaways, can you post examples of these checks being cut to the oil companies or is this more theoretical?
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
no, the money I receive as compensation for my time, efforts, etc in the form aof a paycheck is mine. The physical coin is perhaps the physical property of the fed, but the value is the property of the earner.

As to the govt giveaways, can you post examples of these checks being cut to the oil companies or is this more theoretical?

Only the bills belong to the Fed; the coin belongs to the US govt.
The supposed value of your work is paid in 'stuff' that doesn't belong to you.

I've posted it several times previously, here's the most recent CATO report on the matter ...

Corporate Welfare in the Federal Budget | Tad DeHaven | Cato Institute: Policy Analysis
 
Upvote 0

RedPaddy

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2012
2,527
79
✟3,110.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Only the bills belong to the Fed; the coin belongs to the US govt.
The supposed value of your work is paid in 'stuff' that doesn't belong to you.
If that's true then we have a lot of people in jail that are there on charges of robbing money from banks that really shouldn't be there. It wasn't the bank's money.

Thekla said:
I've posted it several times previously, here's the most recent CATO report on the matter ...

Corporate Welfare in the Federal Budget | Tad DeHaven | Cato Institute: Policy Analysis
Thanks for the link. I find it "interesting" that your definition of corporate welfare includes FHA loan guarantees, Small Business Association loan guarantees, drinking water for citizens in 17 states, and R&D for medical and scientific endeavors.
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
If that's true then we have a lot of people in jail that are there on charges of robbing money from banks that really shouldn't be there. It wasn't the bank's money.


Thanks for the link. I find it "interesting" that your definition of corporate welfare includes FHA loan guarantees, Small Business Association loan guarantees, drinking water for citizens in 17 states, and R&D for medical and scientific endeavors.

It's the CATO Institute's definition - and if Solyndra is a problem, all of it is (including the sizeable chunk to the Oil sector).

Either we continue it or we don't.

As for robbing a bank - the 'stuff' in the bank still belongs to the Fed and the govt. Whether or not I like it, the currency belongs to "Caesar". Wealth is not money/currency.
 
Upvote 0

RedPaddy

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2012
2,527
79
✟3,110.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It's the CATO Institute's definition - and if Solyndra is a problem, all of it is (including the sizeable chunk to the Oil sector).
When I asked you for your definition you provided the link to CATO's definition. Commutative property says it is us thus your definition. Please feel free to restate your definiton if you disagree with the first one you put forth.
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
When I asked you for your definition you provided the link to CATO's definition. Commutative property says it is us thus your definition. Please feel free to restate your definiton if you disagree with the first one you put forth.

Sure, I'd call it that.
But I was trying to clarify that it did not originate with me.
 
Upvote 0

Boondock_Saint

Member since 2006.
Jun 16, 2015
3,308
28
Chicago-ish
✟26,476.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I'm the one who proved that it wasn't from Foxworthy, and I'm the one who said that the source--being unknown--isn't credible.

Now, what does my political icon say?

Good for you. Let me give you a hand :clap:
It doesn't matter who the source is, it is a long standing joke I've been hearing for years. You just don't like it so you are trying very hard to discredit the whole thing. But whole intent of the joke was to point out your exact behavior right now. :kiss:
 
Upvote 0