Hi, Thekla.I'm not sure why "green energy" is not a good idea - unless the USA wants to fall further behind in the global marketplace.

What marketplace?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Hi, Thekla.I'm not sure why "green energy" is not a good idea - unless the USA wants to fall further behind in the global marketplace.
Easy G (G²);61456950 said:It would have been beneficial for the U.S to back the president when he was noting the wisdom of finding ways to switch to alternative energy/green economy as a means of increasing production...
Hi, Thekla.
What marketplace?
We cut Solyndra a check as requested. How's that working out for us now?
There are many within the country who need to be considered when it comes to the issue of innovation in the global market place (i.e. Will Allen whom the First Lady worked with in the campaign to address obesity and find ways of sustainable development--more here, here or here, Majora Carter, Van Jons, etc).It seems we are no longer the country of innovation and entrepreneurship - we're stodgy global has-beens.
As has been noted, corporations are in fact competition and risk-averse (the opposite of the US capitalism mythology). Real capitalists are moving forward in green energy, and as with most new tech - are receiving govt. support.
The US ? still giving 16 billion a year to the oil sector (and tax breaks on top of that) ...
Easy G (G²);61457069 said:There are many within the country who need to be considered when it comes to the issue of innovation in the global market place (i.e. Will Allen whom the First Lady worked with in the campaign to address obesity, Majora Carter, Van Jons, etc). It often seems that for many people who grow up in certain areas innovation is a must for survival--but for others who've never seen things work in action up close/personal, it's always a matter of thinking it won't work. Because the U.S has failed to learn from its mistakes when it didn't listen to the real capitalists who were wanting to invest in alternative energy (George Washington Carver being one amongst many who saw way in advance the reality of Big Oil being an issue), it won't be surprising that we keep falling further and further behind......and yet continue to keep blaming the President for the foolishness of others who refuse to see good opportunities to help.
I really wish people would support him more in what it is he was trying to do with Green-Collar" jobs and keeping jobs here locally....
By "giving" you mean "not taking in the form of taxes", right?It seems we are no longer the country of innovation and entrepreneurship - we're stodgy global has-beens.
As has been noted, corporations are in fact competition and risk-averse (the opposite of the US capitalism mythology). Real capitalists are moving forward in green energy, and as with most new tech - are receiving govt. support.
The US ? still giving 16 billion a year to the oil sector (and tax breaks on top of that) ...
What regulations does Bolivia place on its businesses as oposed to the myriad list the US gov imposes on our businesses? Feel free to include healthcare mandates, insurance coverage, environmental regs, etc.That is not the whole of the issue; how's the US govt. giving 16 billion$ a year to big oil vs. a town in Bavaria supplying all its energy needs and selling back onto the grid for 5.7 million$ a year working for us ?
It wasn't cost effective at the time. Without govt subsidies, which you continually oppose, it still isn't.We could have jumped into solar in the 80s - and didn't. Had we, who knows what our present position in global sales would be ...
By "giving" you mean "not taking in the form of taxes", right?
The failure in that train of thought is that the money belongs to the Govt. when in fact it belongs to the earner.
Propoganda comes into play here as well whenever it comes to that which is different. I'm reminded of what happened when people once railed that it was impossible to ever see men fly, until the Wright brothers, Orville (August 19, 1871 January 30, 1948) and Wilbur (April 16, 1867 May 30, 1912), did what they did as aviation pioneers credited with inventing and building the world's first successful airplane and making a new industry.And this, imo, is where $ in politics takes us - the old guard in business is interested in maintaining their position (which is understandable) and influences political decisions through various means.
Indeed..How many oil companies are interested in shifting the focus on global warming to who caused it (rather than the what is of it) whilst waiting for the perma-frost to recede sufficiently to gain access for drilling ?
Missed opportunities are always a pity...We could have jumped into solar in the 80s - and didn't. Had we, who knows what our present position in global sales would be ...
As an aside - I don't know what money you use, but the coins I have belong to the US govt. and the bills belong to the Federal Reserve - says so right on the bill.
Please. The currency may belong to them, but the money doesn't.
no, the money I receive as compensation for my time, efforts, etc in the form aof a paycheck is mine. The physical coin is perhaps the physical property of the fed, but the value is the property of the earner.No - as the CATO Institute pointed out, the 16 billion is in govt. giveaways. They figure tax breaks (about 22 billion) as a separate phenomenon.
As an aside - I don't know what money you use, but the coins I have belong to the US govt. and the bills belong to the Federal Reserve - says so right on the bill.
no, the money I receive as compensation for my time, efforts, etc in the form aof a paycheck is mine. The physical coin is perhaps the physical property of the fed, but the value is the property of the earner.
As to the govt giveaways, can you post examples of these checks being cut to the oil companies or is this more theoretical?
If that's true then we have a lot of people in jail that are there on charges of robbing money from banks that really shouldn't be there. It wasn't the bank's money.Only the bills belong to the Fed; the coin belongs to the US govt.
The supposed value of your work is paid in 'stuff' that doesn't belong to you.
Thanks for the link. I find it "interesting" that your definition of corporate welfare includes FHA loan guarantees, Small Business Association loan guarantees, drinking water for citizens in 17 states, and R&D for medical and scientific endeavors.Thekla said:I've posted it several times previously, here's the most recent CATO report on the matter ...
Corporate Welfare in the Federal Budget | Tad DeHaven | Cato Institute: Policy Analysis
If that's true then we have a lot of people in jail that are there on charges of robbing money from banks that really shouldn't be there. It wasn't the bank's money.
Thanks for the link. I find it "interesting" that your definition of corporate welfare includes FHA loan guarantees, Small Business Association loan guarantees, drinking water for citizens in 17 states, and R&D for medical and scientific endeavors.
When I asked you for your definition you provided the link to CATO's definition. Commutative property says it is us thus your definition. Please feel free to restate your definiton if you disagree with the first one you put forth.It's the CATO Institute's definition - and if Solyndra is a problem, all of it is (including the sizeable chunk to the Oil sector).
When I asked you for your definition you provided the link to CATO's definition. Commutative property says it is us thus your definition. Please feel free to restate your definiton if you disagree with the first one you put forth.
I'm the one who proved that it wasn't from Foxworthy, and I'm the one who said that the source--being unknown--isn't credible.
Now, what does my political icon say?