No. When I joined CF back in 2005, I was Wiccan, hence the name and avatar. I have since lost my faith, and am now an atheist, but kept my avatar as a throwback to my pagan past. There was never any intention to antagonise, rub, or make a statement.
You answer your own question. "Why are things beautiful? Did nature and these biochemical impulses or motors directed them to be?... What about joy, inner peace and love -- did they evolve too from chemicals?" - yes, yes they did.
Aesthetic is one of those higher-order phenomena that don't have an immediately obvious explanation within evolution (compared to, say, the stripes of a zebra or the counter-shading of a lizard). Nonetheless, the sense of beauty is nothing more than saying one thing is preferable to another based solely on its looks. Culture, as much as evolution, defines what is beautiful, but there are good reasons for why we find a lush, green valley with a meandering, clear blue river running through it, animals wildly gambling about, etc - such a landscape is ideal living conditions, with clean water, and ample game and vegitation. Contrast that to bare, crumbling soil (no water or plants), bones (no animals, and death is common), etc. There are real reasons why the former would be more aesthetically pleasing than the latter. But, of course, culture plays a bigger role, and it's able to swing this basic sense of beauty to point to other things.
The sense of smell is the closest, but don't take it too literally. The spermatozoa is directed by chemical cues that permeate the vagina and beyond. Its tail drives it forward, and its head directs it. Its head, then, points towards the highest concentration of this chemical, or the lowest of that chemical. No actual intelligence is required, any more than an intelligence is needed to explain how a flower follows the Sun.
Sperm only travel at around 1 mm per minute, and the female reproductive tract is quite convoluted, and quite vast in comparison to the size of the sperm and the egg. Without some form of chemical direction, you'd need to carpet the inside of a woman's vagina, uterus, and fallopian tubes, in order to have a chance of hitting the egg. But that's not what happens.
There seems to be no infusion of anything supernatural at any stage. It's a wondrous process, and is well-understood by modern science, but no part of it requires the invocation of spirits.
Held together in what sense? Jesus holds all the protons together, or is it more metaphorical than that?
Actually, it's an incredibly complex process that involves hox genes, regulatory genes, homeoboxes, etc, but it's pretty much all dictated by genetics.
Drop the patronising tone and correct whatever mistakes you think you see. Don't forget I was responding to your words, I wasn't making an exhaustive and sweeping statement of all embryology. You made a fallacious argument (ad ridiculum, to be precise), and I briefly pointed out that, in fact, you weren't far from the truth. You can dismiss it as being fanciful all you want, that's what the evidence shows.
Your threats have been duly noted, and filed away with the rest. Tell me, has your intimidation routine actually ever worked?
So I've heard.