Hi all,
Just thinking further about the healing vs recreative miracle conundrum and as some say that recreative miracles are not covered under Jesus finished work at the atonement (see this thread: www . christianforums.com/t7625499/ )
(Remove spaces from url. This forum wouldn't allow me to post the url for some reason.)
Now we know that cancers may attack internal organs by destroying the cells that make up those organs and that each organ has cells specific to it. Now here is the question. What percentage of cells must remain, hypothetically, for it to be considered a healing, rather than a recreative miracle? At what point, in the progress of the cancer, is it no longer considered to be under "by His stripes we were healed" ??
Would be greatly interested to the answer to this.
Blessings
Splat.
Just thinking further about the healing vs recreative miracle conundrum and as some say that recreative miracles are not covered under Jesus finished work at the atonement (see this thread: www . christianforums.com/t7625499/ )
(Remove spaces from url. This forum wouldn't allow me to post the url for some reason.)
Now we know that cancers may attack internal organs by destroying the cells that make up those organs and that each organ has cells specific to it. Now here is the question. What percentage of cells must remain, hypothetically, for it to be considered a healing, rather than a recreative miracle? At what point, in the progress of the cancer, is it no longer considered to be under "by His stripes we were healed" ??
Would be greatly interested to the answer to this.
Blessings
Splat.