Phred, I hope you see the hypocritical standard you are seeking.
You cannot falsify God either.
Because there's nothing to falsify. Give me one single truth about God. One thing that God IS. You can't. That's why your God can't be falsified. Because your God can't be shown to exist. You harp on this, "you can't falsify God" thing like it's a triumph. It's not a triumph, it's an admission that you can't put forth a single fact that can be falsified.
What you can do is believe the scientific accuracies of the bible were all just lucky guesses and hand wave them away.
The Bible was written by men who knew what men knew at the time they were alive. It shows. It was not written (or inspired) by a god who knows everything there is to know. The very first sentence is wrong. So there are some things that are correct. I would expect men smart enough to be able to write would be observant enough to see the world around them. At the same time I would also expect that these men would see the sun as going around the earth, see the sun as being able to be stopped in the sky, see the earth as the center of the universe and so on.
You have nonsense as evidence for impact theory and big bang
You obviously don't know what you're talking about.
and then have the front to ridicule others that at least can produce a book that demonstrates without doubt inspiration from a higher being.
But it doesn't. It doesn't at all. There's nothing about the Bible that shows it's the product of a higher being. Not. One. Thing.
That alone is more evidence/support for creationst stance 'God did it' than you've got for naturalistic occurances.
If it were true it would be evidence for a tricky, misleading being that most likely was lying in the book since all the physical evidence says otherwise.
The bible is therefore proven to be inspired,
Again, it's not. It's not proven to be inspired and thus God is not proven to exist.
and therefore is a reliable source to assert and state God did it as claimed, and not necessarily using physics we currently understand.
You wish.
Your researchers need to go back to relying on the bible as factual and seeking the science behind it
Scientists tried that for the last two thousand years. It doesn't work. The Bible is to fractured and too antiquated. It's obviously false. Sorry... can't do that anymore. You and your book had your chance. It failed. Stop trying to condemn us to doing it any more.
If they finally start asking the right questions they may finally start getting answers and theoretical research data that supports rather than challenges any current paradigm. Any theory is only as good as the assumption it is based on.
A theory is only as good as the EVIDENCE it's based upon.
Atheist assumptions are incorrect.
If only you could prove that. So far, and it's been a LOOOOOONG time... no gods have been shown to actually exist. Thus all science is atheistic. Or at least agnostic. We don't rule a deity out but the darned thing has to make its presence known.
Therefore you can expect your theoretical science to remain in the huge mess it currently is in, with theories that don't add up and are challenged, not understood, revised or thrown out. eg dark matter, multiple dimensions
It's not in a mess. That's how we progress. We put out hypothesis and try to prove them. If they fail well, ok, we learned something. You'd have us give up and just throw our hands in the air and say, "goddidit" and that's it. So far "goddidit" hasn't ever gotten us anything but dead people.
Neither can you falsify that a deity was not in conscious control of the physics at play in the causation of the universe or the moon, regardless of whether the earth is at the centre or not.
Again, I can't falsify it because you can't offer any evidence that your half-baked idea is in any way remotely true. In order to falsify something you have to give me something to falsify. "goddidit" isn't an hypothesis. It's just a statement of faith.
The first true science book, the bible, is proof a biblical God exists, as it contains inspired knowledge. This is all that is required to 'prove' God did it. The bible does not explain alot about how He created and those are answers for mankind to search for.
It's not a science book. It's wrong about far too much. It's not proof that God or any god exists. And it doesn't explain at all how the world or the universe was created.
God uses physics that mankind is yet to even think about let alone understand. The point being if God did not interceed with intention, the universe and mankind would not be here. There would have been no coalescence of matter as demonstrated by the precision and mathematical unlikelyhood required for coalescence to occur.
God is the creator of the physics that apply to this universe and this is proven by an inspired book that states so, which is more than you can provide at present for any alternative view
Um, no. The Bible isn't at all relevant and any alternative view is far more acceptable than a 4,000 year old book of fairy stories.
)
