-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
The Myth of Darwinian Evolution
- Thread starter mark kennedy
- Start date
KTskater
Well-Known Member
- Dec 2, 2004
- 5,765
- 181
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
No scientist believes in pure Darwinism anymore. It is much more *ahem* evolved now. 
New discoveries have added to Darwin's theory, such as developments in population genetics (which verify the Mendelian genetic theory). Darwin left out a lot of what we now consider the evolutionary theory, and other areas of biology have come in since to fill in the gaps. So, in saying that Darwinian evolution is false, you would be partially correct, in the sense that it does not give a good explanation of the entire evolutionary process.
However, evolution is quite hard to deny when confronted with the overwhelming genetic and fossil evidence.
New discoveries have added to Darwin's theory, such as developments in population genetics (which verify the Mendelian genetic theory). Darwin left out a lot of what we now consider the evolutionary theory, and other areas of biology have come in since to fill in the gaps. So, in saying that Darwinian evolution is false, you would be partially correct, in the sense that it does not give a good explanation of the entire evolutionary process.However, evolution is quite hard to deny when confronted with the overwhelming genetic and fossil evidence.
Upvote
0
philadiddle
Drumming circles around you
I agree that looking into mutational experiments is also good. Here's a few to look up.Comparing skulls on Wikipedia wont show you what actually happens but only sets you up for Darwinian speculation. Look into actual mutational experiments instead.
The Lenski Experiment which shows that multi step mutations take place to give an organism a new function that it didn't have before. In this case it was the ability to utilize citrate as a food source.
Also check out volvox and how it developed eye spots. (Not really eyes, but photo sensitive spots which is the first step
Upvote
0
Similar threads
