lordbt
$
- Feb 23, 2007
- 6,514
- 1,178
- 60
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Which makes neither my statement 'bull' nor the pharmacists actions immoral.It's still bull, because we're talking about a specific case where a pharmacist denied a prescription because of what she thought was going on.
Now death was imminent. Of course.Had this woman died because of the pharmacist's "morally obligated refusal", the blood would've been on the pharmacist's hands. If you don't want to prescribe drugs because you think there was an abortion involved, don't become a pharmacist where you will put people's lives in jeopardy because of a "moral obligation".
Hardly. It is the unprincipled that undermine a just cause.So irresponsible. The fact that this pharmacist comes off as being pro-life is disgusting.
Upvote
0