Diverges to infinity, yes. Reaches infinity in a finite amount of time? No.
Then it wouldn't be diverging to infinity. It would be diverging to some finite state.
Event horizon elimination requires an infinite number of distinct intelligent manipulations. Each manipulation is irreversible, and so adds entropy. The result is an infinite amount of entropy at the final singularity.
Somebody found the number 3 in something and that proves Christianity is true?
Those other things don't have the quidditative properties claimed for God in the traditional religions.
The Omega Point is omniscient, having an infinite amount of information and knowing all that is logically possible to be known; it is omnipotent, having an infinite amount of energy and power; and it is omnipresent, consisting of all that exists. These three properties are the traditional quidditative definitions (i.e., haecceities) of God held by almost all of the world's leading religions. Hence, by definition, the Omega Point is God.
The Omega Point final singularity is a different aspect of the Big Bang initial singularity, i.e., the uncaused first cause, a definition of God held by all the Abrahamic religions.
As well, as Stephen Hawking proved, the singularity is not in spacetime, but rather is the boundary of space and time (see S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973], pp. 217-221).
The Schmidt b-boundary has been shown to yield a topology in which the cosmological singularity is not Hausdorff separated from the points in spacetime, meaning that it is not possible to put an open set of points between the cosmological singularity and *any* point in spacetime proper. That is, the cosmological singularity has infinite nearness to every point in spacetime.
So the Omega Point is transcendent to, yet immanent in, space and time. Because the cosmological singularity exists outside of space and time, it is eternal, as time has no application to it.
Quite literally, the cosmological singularity (i.e., the uncaused cause of all causes) is supernatural, in the sense that no form of physics can apply to it, since physical values are at infinity at the singularity, and so it is not possible to perform the arithmetical operations of addition or subtraction on them; and in the sense that the singularity is beyond creation, as it is not a part of spacetime, but rather is the boundary of space and time.
And given an infinite amount of computational resources, per the Bekenstein Bound, recreating the exact quantum state of our present universe is trivial, requiring at most a mere 10^123 bits (the number which Roger Penrose calculated), or at most a mere 2^10^123 bits for every different quantum configuration of the universe logically possible (i.e., the powerset, of which the multiverse in its entirety at this point in universal history is a subset of this powerset). So the Omega Point will be able to resurrect us using merely an infinitesimally small amount of total computational resources: indeed, the multiversal resurrection will occur between 10^-10^10 and 10^-10^123 seconds before the Omega Point is reached, as the computational capacity of the universe at that stage will be great enough that doing so will require only a trivial amount of total computational resources.
Additionally, the cosmological singularity consists of a three-mode structure: the final singularity (i.e., the Omega Point), the all-presents singularity (which exists at all times at the edge of the multiverse), and the initial singularity (i.e., the beginning of the Big Bang). These three distinct aspects which perform different physical functions in bringing about and sustaining existence are actually one singularity which connects the entirety of the multiverse.
Christian theology is therefore preferentially selected by the known laws of physics due to the fundamentally triune structure of the cosmological singularity (which, again, has all the haecceities claimed for God in the major religions), which is deselective of all other major religions.
For the historical reliability of Jesus Christ's ministry and his bodily resurrection, and the untenability of theories which deny his resurrection, see William Lane Craig, "Contemporary Scholarship and the Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ", Truth, Vol. 1 (1985), pp. 89-95.
http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth22.html For more on the historicity of Jesus Christ's resurrection, see William Lane Craig, Reasonable Faith, Ch. 8: "The Resurrection of Jesus", pp. 333-404, particularly pp. 360 ff.
What I mean when I say "personal interest" is financial gain, rather than whether you're dating him or not.
I don't make any money by speaking about these matters. If that were my interest, then I would promote antitheism, as the New Atheists are promoted by the government-beholden major media. Whereas people such as Profs. Frank J. Tipler and William Lane Craig are virtually persona non grata vis-à-vis the major media.
The New Atheists' media success isn't due to their own merits. Take for example Prof. William Lane Craig, who is far more knowledgeable and well-spoken than any of the New Atheists on the subject of religion (and indeed, more photogenic, since we're speaking to the issue of media success). Rather, their media success is because those in the corporate media tend to like their message, and so those in the media promote their message.
Both academia and the corporate media in our modern day are grafted to the hip of the state, and the natural tendency of the state is to tolerate no God before it. As the inherent inclination of the state is to aggrandize all allegeance to itself--even to the extent of seeking the abolition of the family (as Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels set forth as one of the Communist goals in their Manifesto of the Communist Party); as the natural tendency of people is to owe a higher allegeance to their own family than to the state, which for the state is among the ultimate heresies. The rise of Christianity in the West somewhat shifted this fulcrum of power, so that the state rulers could no longer proclaim themselves gods. The old order was not completely thrown off, but this shift was enough to enable voluntary society to gain a foothold. This liberalization in thought and action brought about by Christianity is *the* great turning-point in history which allowed the rise of free inquiry enough to lead to the Scientific Revolution (its inception dated to the publication of devout Catholic cleric Nicolaus Copernicus's De revolutionibus orbium coelestium).
Thus the love affair by academia and the corporate media with collectivist ideologies, beginning in a major way in the 19th century. If the state hadn't loved Marx, almost no one would even know his name today. (As contrast his ideology's popularity with governments and their toadies with that of the great liberal thinkers of the 19th century, including the great French liberals of the 19th century who Marx admits in his writings is where he obtained his class-conflict theory from [the original being the state against voluntary society]--of which he butchered, making it into a struggle of voluntary actors in society against each other, with the state as the Savior. All of these great 19th century liberal thinkers are virtually unknown today.) The state loves Marx because Marx's Communism is the ultimate aggrandizement of the state: God marching upon the Earth, to paraphrase Georg Hegel's statements on this issue.
And so modern society being basted in collectivist and atheist ideologies is simply nothing more than the state striking back at Christianity, attempting to regain the ground it lost. Although atheism isn't the state's ultimate goal, for the state desires that society worship it as God. But Christianity must be torn down before that can occur.
Indeed, the occultic Thule Society (Thule-Gesellschaft) sponsored the German Workers' Party (Deutsche Arbeiterpartei), which was later transformed by Adolf Hitler into the Nazi Party (i.e., the National Socialist German Workers' Party). It is interesting to note that Hitler's Master Plan was the abolition of Christianity and the formation of a pagan New Age religion, as the recently released (and previously classified) Nuremberg documents prove:
"The Nazi Master Plan: The Persecution of the Christian Churches," U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS) Research and Analysis Branch, July 6, 1945; posted at the Rutgers University School of Law, Camden, New Jersey website in Winter, late 2001.
http://org.law.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/nurinst1.shtml
http://web.archive.org/web/20021218...rs.edu/publications/law-religion/nurinst1.htm
http://org.law.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/publications/nazimasterplan01.pdf
http://org.law.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/publications/nazimasterplan02.pdf
http://org.law.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/publications/nazimasterplan03.pdf
http://org.law.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/publications/nazimasterplan04.pdf
"The Nazi's Persecution of Religion as a War Crime: The OSS's Response Within the Nuremberg Trials Process," Claire Hulme and Dr. Michael Salter, Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2001).
http://org.law.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/publications/churches.pdf
http://org.law.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/articles/RJLR_3_1_2.pdf
http://org.law.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/vol3.shtml
"Camden online legal journal to offer first public look at rare Nuremberg Trial documents," Mike Sepanic, Rutgers-Camden Public Information Office, January 2, 2002
http://web.archive.org/web/20020302...s.edu/medrel/viewArticle.phtml?ArticleID=1984
"Papers reveal Nazi aim: End Christianity," Edward Colimore, Philadelphia Inquirer, January 9, 2002
http://web.archive.org/web/20020111...nt/inquirer/2002/01/09/front_page/JNAZI09.htm
"Hitler's war on Christ," Joel Miller, WorldNetDaily.com, January 12, 2002
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26030
"Analysis: Nazis vs. Christians," Uwe Siemon-Netto, United Press International (UPI), January 14, 2002
http://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2002/01/14/Analysis_Nazis_vs_Christians/UPI-55711011059133/
"You Mean Hitler Wasn't A Priest?," Dave Shiflett, National Review, January 21, 2002
http://www.nationalreview.com/shiflett/shiflett012102.shtml
"Donovan Nuremberg Trials Collection", Cornell University Law Library
http://library.lawschool.cornell.edu/WhatWeHave/SpecialCollections/Donovan/index.cfm
"Nuremberg Trials Collection: The Donovan Archive Index", Cornell University Law Library
http://library2.lawschool.cornell.edu/donovan/show.asp
On the last page above, do a page search on the words "christian" and "church" in order to find documents pertaining to the foregoing matters.
If everyone dropped dead tomorrow, and there was never another life in the universe, it wouldn't make one iota difference to the laws of physics.
According to the known laws of physics it would. They are mutually-contradictory without the Omega Point cosmology. Hence, the Omega Point cosmology is now a mathematical theorem. The only way it could be incorrect is if the known laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) are wrong. Yet they have been confirmed by every experiment conducted to date. Thus, the only way to avoid the Omega Point cosmology is to reject empirical science.
), but trying to squeeze Jesus into the formulae of fundamental physics is just bizarre. The whole thing is a non sequitur.
