• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Didn't they know?

LifeToTheFullest!

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2004
5,069
155
✟6,295.00
Faith
Agnostic
I would say 'yes' -- but I don't know who.

I think it's Turkey.
I read a book several years ago by a modern day "Indiana Jones" who said that the mountains of Ararat are referred to in scripture as Urartu, and are said to be in modern day Iran. Mt. Ararat in Turkey was named after the fact, I think.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,258
52,668
Guam
✟5,157,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I read a book several years ago by a modern day "Indiana Jones" who said that the mountains of Ararat are referred to in scripture as Urartu, and are said to be in modern day Iran. Mt. Ararat in Turkey was named after the fact, I think.
I'd say it's a matter of degrees, eh?
 
Upvote 0

LifeToTheFullest!

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2004
5,069
155
✟6,295.00
Faith
Agnostic
That redwood that doesn't occur in China was imported from China to make a functional giant wooden submarine is not "filling the gaps with reasonable assumptions". It's "making stuff up".
Which is all you can do when the facts don't support your beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,258
52,668
Guam
✟5,157,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Except they are two different geographical areas entirely. Urartu is actually a biblical location, and "Mt. Ararat" is the traditional site, named centuries after. Just degrees though.
Oh.

I have no idea what point you're making.

Are you saying Noah's Ark didn't settle in Turkey? instead it settled in Urutu -- (or wherever)?

Is this another you-think-the-garden-of-eden-was-in-mesopotamia-but-i-think-it-was-in-china point?
 
Upvote 0

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟23,498.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I read a book several years ago by a modern day "Indiana Jones" who said that the mountains of Ararat are referred to in scripture as Urartu, and are said to be in modern day Iran. Mt. Ararat in Turkey was named after the fact, I think.
Hmm. The kingdom of Urartu actually overlapped several modern-day countries. Including Turkey.

Why does it matter exactly where Ararat is, anyway?
 
Upvote 0

LifeToTheFullest!

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2004
5,069
155
✟6,295.00
Faith
Agnostic
Hmm. The kingdom of Urartu actually overlapped several modern-day countries. Including Turkey.

Why does it matter exactly where Ararat is, anyway?
If you're gonna' look for an ark, shouldn't you start in the right place? Just making the point that the traditional "Mt. Ararat" was named so after the fact, and local legends told by villagers in Iran, in the Urartu mts. tell of an ark frozen in the glaciers. Modern day Mt. Ararat is a tourist trap, with all associated economic benefits thereof.

Just sayin'. It's more likely that the biblical "Mt. Ararat" is in modern day Iran.

All my info is from here: Amazon.com: In Search of the Lost Mountains of Noah: The Discovery of the Real Mt. Ararat (9780805420548): Robert Cornuke, David Halbrook: Books: Reviews, Prices & more
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,258
52,668
Guam
✟5,157,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If you're gonna' look for an ark, shouldn't you start in the right place?
I would say the Ark served its purpose, then went the way of the Periodic Table.

Noah may have even dismantled it to build his estate.
 
Upvote 0

Delphiki

Well-Known Member
May 7, 2010
4,342
162
Ohio
✟5,685.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
The word amazing has been popping up here a lot lately.

I think it's amazing that all the straw grasping and science fiction writing involved in attempting to make the story feasible is seen as more likely by some people than just admitting that it's just allegory.

One wonders what straw broke the camel's back, and at what age, when folks found out that Santa was really Mom and Dad.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,258
52,668
Guam
✟5,157,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Maybe. Maybe not.
Well, I certainly can't prove it, but it seems to me that God would not allow evidence like Noah's Ark to hang around.

Think about it.

Should someone find it, I'm sure scientists would be all over it like ants on an apple core -- and conclude that the Ark could not have done what it did in Genesis.

Then, of course, atheists would use that as "proof" that Genesis was wrong; and so on ad nauseum.

By way of example, I think the Ark contained just one feeding trough; possibly a small one.

Scientists would use that to conclude that the Ark had a much smaller animal population.
 
Upvote 0

LifeToTheFullest!

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2004
5,069
155
✟6,295.00
Faith
Agnostic
Well, I certainly can't prove it, but it seems to me that God would not allow evidence like Noah's Ark to hang around.

Think about it.

Should someone find it, I'm sure scientists would be all over it like ants on an apple core -- and conclude that the Ark could not have done what it did in Genesis.

Then, of course, atheists would use that as "proof" that Genesis was wrong; and so on ad nauseum.

By way of example, I think the Ark contained just one feeding trough; possibly a small one.

Scientists would use that to conclude that the Ark had a much smaller animal population.
Except, most people who have been searching for the "ark" in earnest have been people of faith. Which, if found, would then use it to claim "the bible is true," ad nauseum.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,258
52,668
Guam
✟5,157,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I think it's amazing that all the straw grasping and science fiction writing involved in attempting to make the story feasible is seen as more likely by some people than just admitting that it's just allegory.
Not to mention Jonah and the whale, Daniel in the lions' den, and Jesus' resurrection -- right?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,258
52,668
Guam
✟5,157,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Except, most people who have been searching for the "ark" in earnest have been people of faith. Which, if found, would then use it to claim "the bible is true," ad nauseum.
The rule change here prohibits me from answering with what I think about that.
 
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
That's Hollywood for you -- ;)

They probably consulted an evolutionist to help with the script.

Why on Earth would they consult an evolutionist?? An archeologist, or a ship-builder, perhaps... not an evolutionist.
 
Upvote 0