Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There's a lot of pseudo-science mixed in there, Stravinsk.
No one does that. We have a fruit market in our hospital lobby.I'll keep my "psuedo science" and let the health professionals approve of feeding patients Big Macs, fries, Coke, Milkshakes, cookies, cakes and fried chicken. Obviously they know best.
No one does that. We have a fruit market in our hospital lobby.
You keep confusing "medicine" with "bad practice". I've pointed this out to you before.
The Oxford Handbook of Clinical Medicine condenses the current established evidence into a few succinct pages of advice:*sigh*. So um, Lost, what's your weight loss experience and advice? I won't challenge it with one line sweeping generalisations, promise.![]()
I don't see why you want my personal experience. I'm a very atypical sample. The advice in OHCM was compiled by the experience of millions of people, through many research studies.*Your experience* is what is missing from that post, Lost.
No, if you read it carefully (without trying to nitpick) it actually makes plenty of sense.I'll add that someone reading that list from the esteemed Oxford Handbook of Clinical medicine might walk away just a little confused. For instance - eating chips fried in sunflower oil is "ok" but frying foods isn't. Or that the opening line says there are no "good or bad foods" but numerous times refined sugar is warned against. It is interesting that under the heading "Losing weight - why and how" - only refined sugar is warned against specifically - but otherwise we are told to exercise and find a good dietition.
LOL! Our ancestors didn't have obesity, diabetes, hypertension or high cholesterol. They could eat pretty much anything they wanted (providing they could find enough).I notice too that "low fat" dairy is recommended as a general guidline. I'm curious as to how our ancestors improved upon nature and reduced the fat of the cows milk they were consuming so as to stay healthy. Perhaps in the future science will have learned how to remove the puss and blood from cow's milk so as to make it even healthier![/sarcasm]
I don't see why you want my personal experience. I'm a very atypical sample. The advice in OHCM was compiled by the experience of millions of people, through many research studies.
No, if you read it carefully (without trying to nitpick) it actually makes plenty of sense.
LOL! Our ancestors didn't have obesity, diabetes, hypertension or high cholesterol. They could eat pretty much anything they wanted (providing they could find enough).
I don't know what you mean by pus and blood in cow's milk. That's gross. And by the way there isn't any.
Finally, sarcasm isn't needed. I'm not trying to pick a fight with you. I only have a huge problem with the way you present some things which aren't true, as if they were. It's misleading, and can be damaging.
Cool. You could say "such-and-such an approach worked for me". I wouldn't argue against anything like that. But if you then give reasons (e.g. protein binds carbohydrate to impede absorption or whatever) which are incorrect, then I must say something.Because it's relevant to the thread. On the previous page I listed what is the ideal I found for losing weight and keeping it off per *my* personal experience along with the reasons I believe it works. I could have quoted any number of books, dictionarys or authorities *alone*, but personal experience coupled with the knowledge of why it words speaks the loudest.
Because it's better than what the person would otherwise have eaten. Read again.Reading it carefully would still leave the reader confused as to whether fried foods in general do or do not contribute to weight and general bad health. They are advised against generally - but allowed in the case of low sodium crisps fried in sunflower oil.
You do know that obesity is a recent problem. Dairy is great because of the calcium etc that's in it. Removing the fat makes it even greater.Well I don't know the history on that so as to make a conclusive statement - but my point in making that statement was that if dairy were such a great food to eat, why the need to modify it so that it's "low fat"?
SERIOUSLY? You go to Yahoo Answers for your information?Is there really puss and blood in milk? - Yahoo! Answers
Within that link there are two more in the "best answer" you might look at.
OK, pseudo science is damaging because it's fake, by definition. If people believe in fake things, they might:Again, it is only your opinion that they are untrue and "damaging". You didn't specify, just made a general sweeping comment - May I assume that because you might not have read it in a medical book whatever you disagree with or haven't heard of before is automatically labled as quackery and psuedo science?
Cool. You could say "such-and-such an approach worked for me". I wouldn't argue against anything like that. But if you then give reasons (e.g. protein binds carbohydrate to impede absorption or whatever) which are incorrect, then I must say something.
wikipedia said:Digestion is a complex process which is controlled by several factors. pH plays a crucial role in a normally functioning digestive tract. In the mouth, pharynx, and esophagus, pH is typically about 6.8, very weakly acidic. Saliva controls pH in this region of the digestive tract. Salivary amylase is contained in saliva and starts the breakdown of carbohydrates into monosaccharides. Most digestive enzymes are sensitive to pH and will not function in a low-pH environment like the stomach. A pH below 7 indicates an acid, while a pH above 7 indicates a base; the concentration of the acid or base, however, does also play a role.
pH in the stomach is very acidic and inhibits the breakdown of carbohydrates while there. The strong acid content of the stomach provides two benefits, both serving to denature proteins for further digestion in the small intestines, as well as providing non-specific immunity, retarding or eliminating various pathogens.[citation needed]
In the small intestines, the duodenum provides critical pH balancing to activate digestive enzymes. The liver secretes bile into the duodenum to neutralise the acidic conditions from the stomach. Also the pancreatic duct empties into the duodenum, adding bicarbonate to neutralize the acidic chyme, thus creating a neutral environment. The mucosal tissue of the small intestines is alkaline, creating a pH of about 8.5, thus enabling absorption in a mild alkaline in the environment
Because it's better than what the person would otherwise have eaten. Read again.
You do know that obesity is a recent problem. Dairy is great because of the calcium etc that's in it. Removing the fat makes it even greater.
SERIOUSLY? You go to Yahoo Answers for your information?
There is no blood and pus in milk. Pus consists of clumps of dead neutrophils, which forms during an infection. Unless the cow was septic at the time of milking, there was no pus.
OK, pseudo science is damaging because it's fake, by definition. If people believe in fake things, they might:
a) Do things to themselves which are directly harmful.
b) Avoid doing things that actually help, and so indirectly harm themselves.