VictorC
Jesus - that's my final answer
- Mar 25, 2008
- 5,228
- 479
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Please do not ignore this question (below in the quoted post).
Also, I noted that you quoted an absolutely bizzare rendition for Hebrews 4, which mentions nothing concerning the sabbath - even the Greek word is different, and the context refers to it as "another day" differentiated from the sabbath the recipients of this epistle already had from 1500 years of their lives under Moses.
It would seem that you turn to strange places to garner support for the sabbath. This alone is evidence that the Bible doesn't support it, don't you think?
Also, I noted that you quoted an absolutely bizzare rendition for Hebrews 4, which mentions nothing concerning the sabbath - even the Greek word is different, and the context refers to it as "another day" differentiated from the sabbath the recipients of this epistle already had from 1500 years of their lives under Moses.
It would seem that you turn to strange places to garner support for the sabbath. This alone is evidence that the Bible doesn't support it, don't you think?
This "gospel" message contains a number of contradictions to Scripture, that would prohibit it from inclusion to canon. But turning a blind eye to the problems that it has, there is another approach you can use to determine if your selected quote carries any weight.
Return to your quote's source, and determine when the statement concerning the sabbath was given.
Was this statement made before or after the death of the Testator, Who inaugurated the new covenant with His death?
In other words, was this statement made to the children of Israel during the tenure of the Mosaic covenant, or does the statement carry any impact to the church in the new covenant era?
Answering this question honestly will reveal that this suspect quote does not support the sabbath today.
Upvote
0