• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What are the requirenments to go to heaven

What is normally required to get to Heaven?(Check all that apply)

  • Believe that you are a hell-deserving sinner.

  • Believe that Jesus died for your sins.

  • Accept Jesus as the Lord of your life.

  • Accept Jesus as your personal saviour.

  • Get baptized.

  • Invite Jesus into your heart.

  • Live a good life from now on.

  • Refrain from gross sin, such as mass murder, from now on.

  • None of the above.

  • Not applicable: I don't believe in Heaven


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,969
2,521
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟532,270.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
What all is required to go to heaven? Please list everything that is required. If there are additional requirements besides the ones I listed, please detail them here.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: humblemuslim

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
I don't think the question works. Certainly none of the answers work.

The stock answer is "faith in Jesus Christ, his death and resurrection, and that alone", but the truth is that that isn't so much the requirement as the means and the thing itself. Faith, not belief as it says above.

Being part of the Kingdom of God means having Jesus as King. If you don't accept that you aren't part of the Kingdom by definition.
 
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,969
2,521
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟532,270.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The stock answer is "faith in Jesus Christ, his death and resurrection, and that alone", but the truth is that that isn't so much the requirement as the means and the thing itself. Faith, not belief as it says above.

Are you saying that those who don't have "faith in Jesus Christ, his death and resurrection, and that alone" don't make it into heaven? Then that is certainly a requirement, isn't it? If you miss out if you haven't done this, then doing this is a requirement, no?

Being part of the Kingdom of God means having Jesus as King. If you don't accept that you aren't part of the Kingdom by definition.

Is having Jesus as King substantially different from accepting Jesus as Lord? If not, and if you need to have Jesus as King to go to heaven, then you are saying that having Jesus as Lord is a requirement, no?

So I see 2 requirements from you, accept Jesus as King and "faith in Jesus Christ, his death and resurrection, and that alone" whatever that means. Are both required, or can you make it with just one? Are there any more requirements?
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Are you saying that those who don't have "faith in Jesus Christ, his death and resurrection, and that alone" don't make it into heaven? Then that is certainly a requirement, isn't it? If you miss out if you haven't done this, then doing this is a requirement, no?



Is having Jesus as King substantially different from accepting Jesus as Lord? If not, and if you need to have Jesus as King to go to heaven, then you are saying that having Jesus as Lord is a requirement, no?

So I see 2 requirements from you, accept Jesus as King and "faith in Jesus Christ, his death and resurrection, and that alone" whatever that means. Are both required, or can you make it with just one? Are there any more requirements?
They are different ways of saying the same thing, and they aren't requirements so much as definitions.

To help clarify, the Christian hope isn't about going to heaven when you die, but about being part of the future resurrection and restoration of all creation when the Kingdom of God will become a full reality. To be part of that is to accept God's kingship and vice versa.
 
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,969
2,521
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟532,270.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
they aren't requirements

Ah, so they aren't requirements? So you aren't required to have faith to go to heaven? You aren't required to have Jesus as King? Are there no requirements at all to get there?

If there are no requirements, does that mean that eveybody makes it to heaven?
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Ah, so they aren't requirements? So you aren't required to have faith to go to heaven? You aren't required to have Jesus as King? Are there no requirements at all to get there?
That's kind of like asking "do you have to be inside the English borders to go to England". If you have faith you are part of the Kingdom of God (now and future). If you don't have faith you aren't part of the Kingdom of God. If you are part of the Kingdom of God then you do have faith, etc.

One isn't a requirement for the other, the two are equivalent - just framed in different terms.

We need to avoid terms like "going to heaven (when you die)" because that's not what it's about. It's about being part of a future, restored and perfected creation (the "New Heavens and New Earth") when all that is wrong is done away with. That won't be fully implemented - won't become a visible reality - until the final resurrection, but it began with, and exists in principle since, the resurrection of Jesus on Easter Morning.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,969
2,521
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟532,270.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
We need to avoid terms like "going to heaven (when you die)" because that's not what it's about.

This is very confusing Ebia.

Do you or do you not believe that some people go to heaven when they die?
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
This is very confusing Ebia.

Do you or do you not believe that some people go to heaven when they die?
When we die we are 'at rest with Christ' until the final resurrection. Ie it's not the permanent state of things but a temporary state until the New Heavens and New Earth come into being. That was the Jewish understanding long before Jesus, and the understanding of early Christians. That's what the word 'paradise' refers to in New Testament and Jewish texts. Strictly speaking one shouldn't call that heaven, though some do.

The trouble is a lot of medieval art (visual, poetic, etc) failed to distinguish between paradise and the New Creation, and conflagrated to two into an idea that is sub-biblical and more gnostic than truely Judeo/Christian. A lot of hymn writers have also done much to perpetuate the misunderstanding.

The historic Jewish and Christian hope is a two stage thing - a temporary rest in paradise, followed by a physical resurrection into a renewed, put-to-rights "New Creation" at the end of the age.
 
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,969
2,521
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟532,270.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The historic Jewish and Christian hope is a two stage thing - a temporary rest in paradise, followed by a physical resurrection into a renewed, put-to-rights "New Creation" at the end of the age.

OK, your objection to the concept of heaven appears to be the idea that it is a different place from earth. You seem to describe a resurrection to a "New Creation" here on earth which is nearly identical to what most Christians refer to as heaven, except in a different location. But the location, or the delay between death and the resurrection are not the important issues. The concern of this thread is whether some enter eternal joy, and what the requirments are to reach that state.

Let's rephrase the question using your terminology. You write that people resurrect to a "New Creation". What are the requirements to enjoy that "New Creation"? Or does everybody become a part in it?
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
OK, your objection to the concept of heaven appears to be the idea that it is a different place from earth. You seem to describe a resurrection to a "New Creation" here on earth which is nearly identical to what most Christians refer to as heaven, except in a different location. But the location, or the delay between death and the resurrection are not the important issues.
It is tangentially important, because it makes clear why 'carrying on as before' is not an option for anyone. It explains why this has to affect everyone one way or ther other. Ultimately one either chooses to be part of that New Creation or one does not.

The concern of this thread is whether some enter eternal joy, and what the requirments are to reach that state.

Let's rephrase the question using your terminology. You write that people resurrect to a "New Creation". What are the requirements to enjoy that "New Creation"? Or does everybody become a part in it?
Those who have faith in Jesus are a part of it. Johnny either joins in the party game or he doesn't. Joining in isn't a requirement for being in the game, it simply is being in the game. Trying to force something into being an independent criterion for, instead of simply being a part of, is (in this case) completely artificial.

There is no requirement - either you join in what God is doing or you don't. "Faith" is simply one language for talking about that joining in.
 
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,969
2,521
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟532,270.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
it makes clear why 'carrying on as before' is not an option for anyone. It explains why this has to affect everyone one way or ther other. Ultimately one either chooses to be part of that New Creation or one does not.

Huh? Why do you insist that the geographical location of the place of eternal bliss is so important? What does it really matter if it is way out in space or here on a rebuilt earth? Yet somehow you insist that the geographical location of heaven makes it "clear why 'carrying on as before' is not an option." Really? My guess is that there is not a single person here that understands your argument that the physical location of the place of eternal bliess makes such a huge difference. And your attempts to explain your reasoning appear to me to be nothing more then restating the same claim over and over.

[/quote]There is no requirement - either you join in what God is doing or you don't. "Faith" is simply one language for talking about that joining in.[/quote]

Interesting, so we must "join in" if we want to experience that eternal bliss. If you must join in to experinece that bliss, then joining in must be a requirement.

Okay, so to "join in" will bring this eternal blessedness. What in the heck does "join in" mean? How can I know if I have "joined in" or not?
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Huh? Why do you insist that the geographical location of the place eternal bliss is so important? What does it really matter if it is way out in space or here on a rebuilt earth? Yet somehow you insist that the geographical location of heaven makes it "clear why 'carrying on as before' is not an option." Really? My gues is that there is not a single person here that understands your argument that the physical location of the place of eternal bliess makes such a huge difference. And your attempts to explain your reasoning appear to me to be nothing more then restating the same claim over and over.
Sorry if I'm not managing to make the point clear. The difference (so far as this conversation so far is concerned) is that if people are whisked off to heaven then there is no obvious reason why the rest can't carry on on earth "as normal". But if earth is due for a complete makeover then clearly they can't. (There are other huge theological differences, but they don't yet connect directly with your question.)

There is no requirement - either you join in what God is doing or you don't. "Faith" is simply one language for talking about that joining in.[/quote]

Interesting, so we must "join in" if we want to experience that eternal bliss. If you must join in to experinece that bliss, then joining in must be a requirement.
That's playing with words. Joining in is joining in. Joining in isn't a requirement for joining in - it is the thing itself in different words. "Eternal bliss" is the joining in.

Okay, so to "join in" will bring this eternal blessedness. What in the heck does "join in" mean? How can I know if I have "joined in" or not?
Okay, that's where (relatively) concrete ideas like faith come in. If you have faith in Jesus of Nazareth, his death and resurrection, then you have joined in. If you don't then you haven't (at least, you haven't yet).

Faith can be seen as the badge that one has joined in, that one is part of the people of God, as circumcision was the badge before.
 
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,969
2,521
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟532,270.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The difference (so far as this conversation so far is concerned) is that if people are whisked off to heaven then there is no obvious reason why the rest can't carry on on earth "as normal". But if earth is due for a complete makeover then clearly they can't.
Huh? What does any of this have to do with the importance of the geographical location of eternal bliss? Some believe the present earth will be destroyed and believers will go to a new place of bliss (heaven). You write that the earth will be rebuilt as the place of bliss. But both agree that nobody can carry on as normal here on earth after the end comes.

So again, you haven't expained why the location of this eternal bliss is of such overwhelming importance to you.

Okay, that's where (relatively) concrete ideas like faith come in. If you have faith in Jesus of Nazareth, his death and resurrection, then you have joined in. If you don't then you haven't (at least, you haven't yet).

Ah, so all you need is faith? If you have faith you have joined in? And it does not matter if you go on a mass murder spree or live a good life, as long as you have faith?

Or is perhaps something more required then just faith?
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Huh? What does any of this have to do with the importance of the geographical location of eternal bliss? Some believe the present earth will be destroyed and believers will go to a new place of bliss (heaven). You write that the earth will be rebuilt as the place of bliss. But both agree that nobody can carry on as normal here on earth after the end comes.
Yes, but my model explains why that's true. Their model needs an additional explanation.

So again, you haven't expained why the location of this eternal bliss is of such overwhelming importance to you.
it's not that big a deal to what we've talked about so far, which I acknowledged by saying it was of tangential significance. It is important for a lot of other reasons, but unless you want to go there that would be a sidetrack.

Ah, so all you need is faith? If you have faith you have joined in? And it does not matter if you go on a mass murder spree or live a good life, as long as you have faith?
Faith leads one into an increasingly proper life. Faith isn't just an intellectual ascent to certain facts - it's putting one's trust, one's life, in Jesus' hands.
 
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,969
2,521
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟532,270.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Faith leads one into an increasingly proper life. Faith isn't just an intellectual ascent to certain facts - it's putting one's trust, one's life, in Jesus' hands.

But you still have free will don't you? And if there is free will, don't some choose evil?

So what happens if one has faith and chooses evil? Is he no longer "joined in".
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
But you still have free will don't you? And if there is free will, don't some choose evil?
I'm not yet perfected and restored - I will still make some bad choices.

So what happens if one has faith and chooses evil? Is he no longer "joined in".
If one has faith then one will "choose evil" less and less.
 
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,969
2,521
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟532,270.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
If one has faith then one will "choose evil" less and less.

I don't know. Some people of faith have chosen much evil.

But that is beside the point. You appear to be saying that one could make it to your place of eternal bliss while going on repeated mass murder sprees, and laughing gleefully at those being killed.
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
I don't know. Some people of faith have chosen much evil.

But that is beside the point. You appear to be saying that one could make it to your place of eternal bliss while going on repeated mass murder sprees, and laughing gleefully at those being killed.
A real faith does change people for the better. Often slowly and in fits-and-starts, but it does change people.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.