Your trust and the act of choosing not to resist transformation may be one and the same thing for you, but please understand that other people refer to a different trust that is different from what you describe as trust, and they also refer to their trust as faith in Christ. OK? So why do your words imply that you absolutely refuse to believe that their might be other people in this world who are trusting God for something different than what your trust for? Why must trust be, by definition, only the trust that you have? Don't you understand that some people see things differently from you?
Which is why I said: "
I would have to ask what they meant by 'faith' (or trust). It
sounds to me like what they are talking about is belief, not faith."
So far as I can see trusting Jesus would include (by necessary implication) trusting him to transform them. For me to say anything about someone claiming to trust him but not to trust him to transform them I would need to engage in a conversation with that person to understand what they meant by that, and specifically what if anything they meant by trust if it doesn't including trusting Jesus to do what he says he will do to/in/for those who trust him. Because, so far as I can see, saying "I trust Jesus, but not to transform me" is self-contradictory.
You speak of allowing God to transform you as a necessary condition for eternal bliss.
Not "necessary for" but becoming part of, the Kingdom of God. Unless things (including us) are put right they aren't Kingdom of God stuff. It makes no more sense to suggest someone can be part of the Kingdom of God without being transformed than to suggest someone can be in England without travelling there.
But what if somebody stops allowing this transformation? People with freewill do change their minds, don't they?
Then they no longer have faith, and unless they change their mind again they are choosing not to be part of the Kingdom of God
by definition. Same as if one is driving across Europe to get to London - if they turn around somewhere in France they can't then complain that they don't get to Dover.
Your entrance into eternal bliss is based on works, isn't it?
Depends what one means by that. Works aren't the
means of getting there, but they are part of the journey.
To obtain your bliss one must commit himself to doing the transformed things for the rest of his life, and that transformation must last for a lifetime. Yes you may trust God to make the transformation, but your words say it requires a lifetime of works from the point of trust onward.
If you want to play word-games you can turn anything around. The Kingdom of God is
about transforming (all) Creation to be free of evil, death and suffering. Including us. That transformation comes from God. The faith that allows that comes from God. If choosing not to reject that is a "work" in your view so be it, but you've reduced the work to near meaninglessness - you can make simply existing to be transformed a "work" if you want, but the conversation becomes pretty ridiculous at that point.
Grace brings about Faith, allows transformation, results in "work" (horribly inappropriate word). And that process
is the incoming of the Kingdom of God that we are and will be part of. And that's why I keep objecting to your vision of heaven - these are not arbitrary requirements for some external thing, but the very coming about of the thing itself.