I am very confused

[Truthstriker]

After looking through the bible I found something on the 2nd page of the bible.
"And God said, I created man in our image.
Part of Genesis 2:26
Our means more than one person. So if I understand this correctly the bible states that their is more than one god.

 

[LJSGM]

It is pointing to the trinity.

There is only one God.

How you looked up what the trinity means?

 

[Truthstriker]

You have not answered my question. Our means more than one. If god is real he is not in 3 parts or 3 things. Our would refer to a group of people. Therefore in the bible to stated that God is either part of a species of people or maybe part of a family of super-beings.

 

[LJSGM]

There are resources available on the trinity.

If you truely want to understand, you could look them up.

I believe there's even a wiki on this christian forums site as well.

 

[Truthstriker]

Once again you have not answer my question. Our means more than one PERSON. no a part of 1 person. So once again I will spell it out for you. Since our means more than one person or thing or sentient, then the bible alludes to the fact that there is more than one god. Please answer my question without telling me to look something up.

 

[LJSGM]

Are you trying to convince me that it's wrong, or yourself?

I can't give you understanding if you aren't searching for it.

 

[Truthstriker]

Once again NO. I am simply trying to understand why the bible is using the word our ti describe one god.

 

[LJSGM]

and I'm trying to tell you it has to do with the trinity. If you don't understand the trinity, then you can't understand those verses.

 

[Truthstriker]

Ok fine. I will reseach trinity. Then I will get back to you.

 

[drich0150]

"God" is not a name, but a title. Even if "we" sometimes use it to describe God the Father, it is not his name..

It's kinda like saying King Edward.. "King" is not the Kings name Edward is. King is his title, but in calling him King you would not be dishonoring him.. The same is true with "The trinity" of God. You can use the term "God" to describe any one of them, because all are 100% God. We and most of history tend to refer to the "Father" as God, and the "Son" as Jesus, and the Holy Spirit as The Holy Spirit.

So God by saying, Let's make man in "Our" own image, is referring to the God head or "Trinity" or all three distinct personalities of the one God (Remember title not name) saying lets make man to look and react like we would..

 

[Truthstriker]

Ok after looking at your post Drich and looking up trinity in wikipedia it is my understanding that their is 3 beings. The holy sprit,father,and Jesus which is the son. However if you look at this literaly Jesus can not be the son of god because he had a human mother and a human father. Jesus is not the son of God because God is not human. Therefore since Jesus is not the son of god, then God is the not the father. The holy spirit is the only form of god. God only has one personality. God does not have multiple personalities disorder. So if god is real he is not in solid form. therefore he is not a he but simply it. Jesus was a jewish rabah. He had a human father and a female mother. He was a prophet nothing more nothing less. So there is father and there is not son. So please tell me what else our could refer to if anything else at all.

 

[drich0150]

The holy spirit,father,and Jesus which is the son. However if you look at this literally Jesus can not be the son of god because he had a human mother and a human father. Jesus is not the son of God because God is not human. Therefore since Jesus is not the son of god, then God is the not the father. The holy spirit is the only form of god. God only has one personality. God does not have multiple personalities disorder.

We have assigned these titles to the presents of God so as to better relate and understand the distinct personalities of God.. You are right if you hold these personalities of God to the strictest form of our popular cultures understanding of their definitions.. God the "father" isn't an earthly father, nor is Jesus an earthly "son."

But have you considered that Maybe instead of God emulating what a father is here in this life, or Jesus emulating what it is to be a son here in this life, that in fact it is us who emulate God and his qualities as a father?? Or God as a son???

Think about what does a good father do, or what is his responsibilities? He cares for and protects his "house hold" He directs and sets the tempo for the family.. Now what about the son? He listens and obeys his father, in the same way a good father will respect and honor his son..

Maybe this is where we get the Idea of what it is to be Father and son.. And for whatever reason the world chooses to look at linage or birth order to determine these roles..

One more thing that maybe you still are missing.. God is not the deities Name. It is a title that describes there collective function.. Just because you may refer to God and think of an old man sitting on a throne with a long white beard doesn't make it so.. Because it "God" is a title, and not a name, it would make it plausible for different separate deities to be united in one function or collectively hold one Job as The God. Or The Ruler..

 

[Truthstriker]

As a side question isnt God's Name Jehovah in the old testement?
other then that thank you for helping me understand that.

 

[drich0150]

Wiki search results:

Jehovah is an English reading of [FONT='SBL Hebrew', David, Narkisim, 'Microsoft Sans Serif', 'Times New Roman']יְהֹוָה[/font], the most frequent form of the Tetragrammaton [FONT='SBL Hebrew', David, Narkisim, 'Microsoft Sans Serif', 'Times New Roman']יהוה[/font], the name of God in the Hebrew Bible, in the text with vowel points handed down by the Masoretes.
It is a direct phonetic transliteration. By long tradition, in modern Jewish culture the Tetragrammaton is not pronounced. Instead the above vocalization indicates to the reverent Jewish reader that the term Adonai is to be used. In places where the preceding or following word already is Adonai, the reading Elohim is used instead, indicated by a different vocalization of the Tetragrammaton.[1] It is generally agreed therefore, in line with Jewish teaching, that [FONT='SBL Hebrew', David, Narkisim, 'Microsoft Sans Serif', 'Times New Roman']יְהֹוָה[/font] (Jehovah) is a "hybrid form",[2] created when the Masoretes added the vowel pointing of Adonai to the consonants of YHWH. Early English translators, unacquainted with Jewish tradition, read this word as they would any other word, and transcribed it (in very few places, namely those where the Name itself was referred to) as Jehovah.

(Basically it is one of many "names/titles" of God.. in hebrew)

 

[LJSGM]

Here's some good verses for you to think on if you want.

John 1

1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was with God in the beginning.


3Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4In him was life, and that life was the light of men. 5The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood[a] it.
6There came a man who was sent from God; his name was John. 7He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all men might believe. 8He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light. 9The true light that gives light to every man was coming into the world.[b]
10He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13children born not of natural descent,[c] nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God. 14The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[d] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

 

[Ikuis]

After looking through the bible I found something on the 2nd page of the bible.
"And God said, I created man in our image.
Part of Genesis 2:26
Our means more than one person. So if I understand this correctly the bible states that their is more than one god.

Not necessarily. In fact, according to the Bible there are all kinds of spiritual beings including, for example, angels and demons. But in this case, as has been previously stated, it is generally held that the Bible is referring to the three persona of the Trinity. The concept of the Trinity is very difficult to grasp and is the subject of many forum discussions!

But I don't think you need to look for anything deeper than to consider the "our" to mean God the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. This phrase in Genesis (which is actually Gen 1:26, not 2:26) points to the existence of Christ in heaven even before his birth as a human.

I think a more important point to think about here, rather than who these beings are, would be to think what "in our image" means. Does it mean God is human-shaped? Or does it refer to our human characteristics of love, conscience, self-awareness, capability of distinguishing good from bad, etc.

What do you think "image" means here?

 

[Ikuis]

Jesus was a jewish rabah. He had a human father and a female mother. He was a prophet nothing more nothing less. So there is father and there is not son. So please tell me what else our could refer to if anything else at all.

If you believe that Jesus was nothing more than a prophet then you have many more and greater problem verses in the bible than the issue on "our" in Gen 1:26.
For example:
The appearances of the resurrected Jesus to over 500 people after his crucifixion (1 Cor 15:6)

"Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people; and he will appear a second time....." Heb 9:28

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning" John 1:1-2

The last of these also gives a biblical explanation to the "our" in your original query concerning Gen 1:26.

 

[Truthstriker]

Ikuis you are using a 1600 year book as proof that over 500 people saw Jesus after his crucifixion. Also in the bible It shows Jesus leading a army to kill a city. All man and children were killed. The women were raped. And yet god is called all loving. Please explain this.

 

[ephraimanesti]

Ikuis you are using a 1600 year book as proof that over 500 people saw Jesus after his crucifixion. Also in the bible It shows Jesus leading a army to kill a city. All man and children were killed. The women were raped. And yet god is called all loving. Please explain this.

Actually, the Bible is approximately 6500 years old and Jesus, who taught us to love our enemies, never led an army or was ever involved in harming another human being in any way.

Where in the world are you getting your information?! You are indeed "very confused."

A BOND-SLAVE OF CHRIST,
ephraim

 

[Truthstriker]

You seem to be VERY confused. If you actually read the bible you will know that 6500 years ago was the creation of earth. 6500 years ago paper was not used. The bible was created 400 years after Jesus's death. So I will ask you sir, where in the world are YOU getting your information.