It seems like there is a stigma to recognizing what is bad. This seems silly to me. If something is wrong we should speak and act against it to make it go away, so long as it is bad for society. Right?
It seems like there is a stigma to recognizing what is bad. This seems silly to me. If something is wrong we should speak and act against it to make it go away, so long as it is bad for society. Right?
I suggest that you start by jailing heterosexuals having premarital sex. Then you must invade the homes of married heterosexuals who are having sex for any reason other than procreation. If people are having oral sex, that's sodomy - again, off to jail. And we will throw all the gay people in there as well. And then once we have jailed the majority of the population, we will have no more room more murderers, and thieves, so then, rather than tolerate people living their lives in their own homes, you will have people whose crimes do not exist unless they have a victim to kill or steal from, and if you are the last person left, guess who's gettting a bullet in the head just to take your flat screen TV?
And you think that is a good idea?
I don't understand this: the people that claim that they don't want Big Government want the government to invade even our private sexual lives.
You don't get anymore Big Government than that.
It seems like there is a stigma to recognizing what is bad. This seems silly to me. If something is wrong we should speak and act against it to make it go away, so long as it is bad for society. Right?
It is BY LAW that Gay Culture is being FORCED onto an unwilling populace.
GLBT's are seeking BIG government to force their sexual tastes be accepted BY LAW, by all.
You don't get anymore bigger goverment that that.
Your arguments are slowly deteriorating into hysterics.It is BY LAW that Gay Culture is being FORCED onto an unwilling populace.
GLBT's are seeking BIG government to force their sexual tastes be accepted BY LAW, by all.
You don't get anymore bigger goverment that that.
It is BY LAW that Gay Culture is being FORCED onto an unwilling populace.
GLBT's are seeking BIG government to force their sexual tastes be accepted BY LAW, by all.
You don't get anymore bigger goverment that that.
Autumnleaf, I think we agree that thieves and murderers are bad because they harm others. Could you explain exactly how sodomites harm others?
It seems like there is a stigma to recognizing what is bad. This seems silly to me. If something is wrong we should speak and act against it to make it go away, so long as it is bad for society. Right?
If you think that something is bad then you should voice your opinions.
However, you should be prepared for people to have differing opinions to you.
Following that you should be able to back up your claims.
It is demonstrable how theft and murder are damaging to society.
Homosexuality is a very different to these.
i'll agree with you on murder and stealing (who doesn't?) but for sodomy to be "bad" it would have to involve someone other than consenting adults. Otherwise they're not hurting anyone and it's none of my business.
And it doesn't even necessarily have to be purely damaging to society but also merely damaging to the person.
I do not want to be trendy but you can point out that when sodomy and sexual decadence entered most civilizations it did begin marking their downfalls.
Do these people carry influence over the society?
Riddle me that.
What does their influence mean to society?
When we think about how society reinforces its laws, we usually think of law enforcement agencies doing what they're contracted to do in protecting people and property. But there are other kinds of laws and other kinds of enforcers. Arthur Dong's documentary Licensed to Kill explores the "laws" — sometimes written, sometimes simply understood — against homosexuality and the men who take it upon themselves to rid the world of what they've been trained to think of as a weak, disposable group — gay men. In this graphic look at a loose subculture of murderers of gays, Dong exposes not simply a group of rampaging sociopaths but, more importantly, a society that carefully creates them.
making up villainy to attack is not really worthy of bein recognized. much less praisedPeople try to give such little credit to Christians on this website that even recognizing rightfully vilainized vilains as bad has become hard to get done.
The devil was just a rational egoist...
can you even prove this nonsense? can you show that sodomy is damaging to society or people?Well, it isn't.
And it doesn't even necessarily have to be purely damaging to society but also merely damaging to the person.
oh please, have you ever read any history that isn't written to make it look like "the gays did it"?I do not want to be trendy but you can point out that when sodomy and sexual decadence entered most civilizations it did begin marking their downfalls.
Why?
The society forgets its most basic moral tenets.
a lot of people, many of them that helped advance us to the point that we are at.Do these people carry influence over the society?
Riddle me that.
What does their influence mean to society?
Please explain how sodomy has damaged me.