Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Its called freedom to assemble. Private clubs can have as strict of regulations of whoever can be in as they want. Its no different from allowing churches having creeds or baptisms be required to join.
If it is a club meeting on school ground and receiving official recognision it is not a private club.
So Skinheads could indeed join and even change the rules of the club if they gained a majority?
I'm not sure that the Equal Access law says anything about disruption which is quite a vague termSo...is our goal here to keep submitting different types of people to see if anyone will say "Oh no, not those guys!"If so can I save us all some time and effort and just post this: "Yes, X can join the group as long as they don't disrupt the group."
tulc(wash, rinse, repeat as needed)![]()
Well, any group will probably have a rule saying "if you disrupt the group then you will be kicked out." So if a skinhead decides to actually put up anti-discrimination posters or whatever, then it'd be okay. But if said skinhead instead starts vandalizing NAACP Jr.'s own posters, then he'd be kicked out just like anybody else.I'm not sure that the Equal Access law says anything about disruption which is quite a vague term
And what if the skinheads join en masse to vote to change the rules, even the mission of the club? Should they be allowed to do that?Well, any group will probably have a rule saying "if you disrupt the group then you will be kicked out." So if a skinhead decides to actually put up anti-discrimination posters or whatever, then it'd be okay. But if said skinhead instead starts vandalizing NAACP Jr.'s own posters, then he'd be kicked out just like anybody else.
The point of course is that there are many reasons for a club to be exclusive most are. For example, the Chess Club excludes people who want to join the club to play football. The only clubs that get penalized for such things, however, is the Christian clubs. And even though our left leaning friends will likely never admit it, this expose the blatant double standard from their side of the aisleWash, rinse, repeat as needed.![]()
Thanks, I corrected that. You're a standup guytulc(thinks you forgot a "v" in your post)![]()
Good for them -- I'm glad I live in a country where I have the right to tell your GOD to get bent.
There will come a day when you will rue the day you said these words.
Tick, tick, tick...
***************************************************************************************************There will come a day when you will rue the day you said these words.
Tick, tick, tick...
Just not Christian clubs apparently
And what if the skinheads join en masse to vote to change the rules, even the mission of the club? Should they be allowed to do that?
Yeah they can. I doubt an open member of the Church of Satan will be allowed into College Ministries
You're missong the point here which is that the Christian club mentioned was denied recognition because it did exclude syuch people, and that denial has been heratily approved by our friends on the left.If the organisation is open to all, then yes, they should be allowed to join; however, they must be respectful of the rules and regulations of the organisation. As to changing those some rules, make the process extremely difficult - decisions must be unanimous, etc.
You're missong the point here which is that the Christian club mentioned was denied recognition because it did exclude syuch people, and that denial has been heratily approved by our friends on the left.
Perhaps you did miss itWait, what Christian club? I must have missed it.