How many?

[TheBear]

How many different areas of scientific study needs to be wrong in order for YEC creationism to be right?

I'll update here...

Biology
Physics
Anthropology
Geology
Paleontology
Biochemistry
Computer Science
Cosmology
Astrophysics
Quantum Mechanics
Agronomy
Pharmacology
Nuclear Physics
Astronomy
Climatology
Archeology
Linguistics
Genetics
Biogeography

 

[Reanimation]

Are we listing them one at a time?

Physics (e.g. claiming that the speed of light varies)

 

[Paconious]

Quatum mechanics

Creationist: God knows all. He is omnipotent. He created everything and knows the position of everything in his creation.

Physics: There is no way to predict the location of a lepton.

Creationist: HE KNOWS!

 

[Tomk80]

Off the top of my head
Physics
Anthropology
Geology
Paleontology
Biochemistry
Computer science (genetic algorithms)

 

[TheBear]

List as many as you would like.

So far...

Biology
Physics

 

[TheBear]

So far...

Biology
Physics
Anthropology
Geology
Paleontology
Biochemistry
Computer science

I'll add - Cosmology

 

[Paconious]

Would modern medicine fit into biochemistry or biology? maybe biomedicine? What i'm getting at is that evolution predicts mutations which are necessary to create new vaccinations.

 

[Molal]

So far...

Biology
Physics
Anthropology
Geology
Paleontology
Biochemistry
Computer science

I'll add - Cosmology

Agronomy,
pharmacology

 

[Vene]

Nuclear physics/chemistry

 

[sbvera13]

Plain ol' fashioned History is my favorite. (Ancient Egypt. Flood. 'Nuff said)

Astronomy
Population Geography
Climatology (ice cores)

 

[MasterOfKrikkit]

I know theology doesn't count as a scientific discipline, but can I add it to the list anyway?

And since YECism relies on Biblical literalism, which gives us pi=3, I guess we should add mathematics (or at least geometry).

 

[Maxwell511]

Archeology and glottochronology.

Archeology because of archaeological evidence of the continuity of cultures through the supposed global flood and glottochronology because it is a new word that I learned that sounds cool. I'm sure if glottochronology is based on reality it must disagree with the tower of babel or something.

 

[AV1611VET]

How many different areas of scientific study needs to be wrong in order for YEC creationism to be right?

ZERO --- if they would get it right in the first place.

 

[TheBear]

ZERO --- if they would get it right in the first place.

That's cute, AV.

How many different areas of scientific study got it wrong now?

 

[AintNoMonkey]

I think the easy answer is "all of thems".

 

[TheBear]

I'm going to add Astrophysics to the list.

 

[TheBear]

Updated OP list.

 

[Vene]

Well, paleontology is on the list, why not archeology

 

[Split Rock]

How many different areas of scientific study needs to be wrong in order for YEC creationism to be right?

I'll update here...

Biology
Physics
Anthropology
Geology
Paleontology
Biochemistry
Computer Science
Cosmology
Astrophysics
Quantum Mechanics
Agronomy
Pharmacology
Nuclear Physics
Astronomy
Climatology

Linguistics

 

[Split Rock]

ZERO --- if they would get it right in the first place.

The question is, how many modern scientific disciplines must be currently wrong in order to rationize a literal interpretation of scripture with reality. Tell us AVET, why are so many disciplines wrong??