- Feb 9, 2007
- 6,089
- 2,288
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- UK-Conservative
I recommend you check out this webpage:I believe there is a mass misconception between adaptation and evolution. Adaptation allows species to survive, evolution makes man from a monkey. You get a new flu shot every year because the virus adapts, it is still a virus and it is still the flu.
There are several different species of dog, but there is no evidence that a dog was ever anything but a dog.
Evolution is easy to look at in a broad perspective but when you get into the the details it loses all evidence.
For example, we went from worms that had miniature feet like things and then the next thing on the chart from the Cambrian era is a Lobster with several feet, a body, and eyes.... So how did we get from this worm thing to the lobster thing without any transitional fossils? No evidence that multiple legs evolved, no evidence that a head evolved at all, no evidence that even eyes evolved. they just Poof, were there.
Some might say that we are missing the transitional fossils but even the top evolutionists are at a loss because they find it highly unlikely that we should be missing this many fossils.
I'm all for adaptation and speciation, but once it crosses from one animal to another animal entirely, it loses all validity.
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/topics/Evolution/PSCF12-97Miller.html
and this webpage:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html
Both will help dispell your misunderstanding on transitional fossils, in particular transitional fossile between the precambrian and cambrian.
This website, http://www.gpc.edu/~pgore/geology/geo102/cambrian.htm
provides background on the early palaeozoic with lots of links you can click on and get more info!
Enjoy
Upvote
0