- Nov 10, 2006
- 26,146
- 5,348
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Scripture would be awesome and helpful.
sunlover
sunlover
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I would venture to say something along the lines of Word/Sword of Spirit and Truth, which conquers Death and Hades. Will work on verses later.Scripture would be awesome and helpful.
sunlover
Scripture would be awesome and helpful.
sunlover
Wow, thank you LLOJ.I would venture to say something along the lines of Word/Sword of Spirit and Truth, which conquers Death and Hades. Will work on verses later.
Reve 19:20 and the Wild-Beast was taken, and with him the False-Prophet who did the signs before him, in which he led astray those who did receive the mark of the beast, and those who did bow before his image; living they were Cast--the two--to the Lake of the fire, that is burning with brimstone;
Exodus 15:1 Then sang Mosheh and the sons of Yisra'el this song unto YHWH, and they spake saying,--"I will sing to YHWH for He is exalted exalted,--The horse and his rider hath He cast into the Sea. 2 My might and melody is Yah And He became mine salvation/y@shuw'ah.--This is my 'El and I will glorify Him, 'Elohiym of my father and I will set Him on high". '
According to Protestant SBible Scholars.
And what about the "keys of the kingdom"? . . . About 700 B.C. an oracle from God announced that this authority in the royal palace in Jerusalem was to be conferred on a man called Eliakim . . . (Isa. 22:22). So in the new community which Jesus was about to build, Peter would be, so to speak, chief steward.
INteresting.All these New Testament pictures and usages go back to a picture in Isaiah (Is 22:22) . . . Now the duty of Eliakim was to be the faithful steward of the house . . . So then what Jesus is saying to Peter is that in the days to come, he will be the steward of the Kingdom.
k, more Scripture.......In biblical and Judaic usage handing over the keys does not mean appointment as a porter but carries the thought of full authorization (cf. Mt. 13:52; Rev. 3:7) . . . The implication is that Jesus takes away this authority from the scribes and grants it to Peter.
KThe prime minister, more literally 'major-domo,' was the man called in Hebrew 'the one who is over the house,' a term borrowed from the Egyptian designation of the chief palace functionary . . .
Very cool.Just as in Isaiah 22:22 the Lord puts the keys of the house of David on the shoulders of his servant Eliakim, so does Jesus hand over to Peter the keys of the house of the kingdom of heaven and by the same stroke establishes him as his superintendent. There is a connection between the house of the Church, the construction of which has just been mentioned and of which Peter is the foundation, and the celestial house of which he receives the keys. The connection between these two images is the notion of God's people.
Interesting. STill not what I thought myself.Not only is Peter to have a leading role, but this role involves a daunting degree of authority (though not an authority which he alone carries, as may be seen from the repetition of the latter part of the verse in 18:18 with reference to the disciple group as a whole). The image of 'keys' (plural) perhaps suggests not so much the porter, who controls admission to the house, as the steward, who regulates its administration (cf. Is 22:22, in conjunction with 22:15). The issue then is not that of admission to the church . . . , but an authority derived from a 'delegation' of God's sovereignty.
Hmmm.The opening words of v.22, with their echo of 9:6, emphasize the God-given responsibility that went with it [possession of the keys], to be used in the king's interests. The 'shutting' and 'opening' mean the power to make decisions which no one under the king could override. This is the background of the commission to Peter (cf. Mt 16:19) and to the church (cf. Mt 18:18).
WOW, there's some commentary there.For further references to the office of the steward in Old Testament times, see 1 Kings 4:6; 16:9; 18:3; 2 Kings 10:5; 15:5; 18:18, where the phrases used are "over the house," "steward," or "governor." In Isaiah 22:15, in the same passage to which our Lord apparently refers in Matt 16:19, Shebna, the soon-to-be deposed steward, is described in various translations as:
1) "Master of the palace" {Jerusalem Bible / New American Bible}2) "In charge of the palace" {New International Version}3) "Master of the household" {New Revised Standard Version}4) "In charge of the royal household" {New American Standard Bible}5) "Comptroller of the household" {Revised English Bible}6) "Governor of the palace" {Moffatt}As the robe and the baldric, mentioned in the preceding verse, were the ensigns of power and authority, so likewise was the key the mark of office, either sacred or civil. This mark of office was likewise among the Greeks, as here in Isaiah, borne on the shoulder. In allusion to the image of the key as the ensign of power, the unlimited extent of that power is expressed with great clearness as well as force by the sole and exclusive authority to open and shut. Our Saviour, therefore, has upon a similar occasion made use of a like manner of expression, Matt 16:19; and in Rev 3:7 has applied to himself the very words of the prophet.
Yeah, I don't see this implication myself.(Adam Clarke, [Methodist], Commentary on the Bible, abridged ed., Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1967 [orig. 1832], 581)
In the . . . exercise of the power of the keys, in ecclesiastical discipline, the thought is of administrative authority (Is 22:22) with regard to the requirements of the household of faith. The use of censures, excommunication, and absolution is committed to the Church in every age, to be used under the guidance of the Spirit . . .
So Peter, in T.W. Manson's words, is to be 'God's vicegerent . . . The authority of Peter is an authority to declare what is right and wrong for the Christian community. His decisions will be confirmed by God' (The Sayings of Jesus, 1954, p.205).
(New Bible Dictionary, ed. J.D. Douglas, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Pub. Co., 1962, 1018)
Yeah, this is more along the lines I wasI can show how the First Fathers of the Church interpreted this also but it's obvious Jesus does not give the keys of the kingdom to his Apostles. Jesus gives the keys to Peter alone. If Jesus really gives Peter alone the keys, then it looks like Peter has special authority that the other apostles do not have.What "role" did Christ give "individually" to Peter? Well, in Matthew 16:17-19, Christ individually imparts to Peter the office of "Rock," "Key-bearer," and the authority to "bind and loosen." Also, in Luke 22:31-32, the Lord individually imparts to Peter the task of strengthening his brethren (i.e. the other Apostles). Also, in John 21:15-19, the Lord makes Peter a shepherd, telling him three times to "feed my lambs" and "tend my sheep."Peter unlocks the door to the Gentiles because he is the one with the keys. Unlocking the door to the Gentiles is a divine act that only Jesus can do, and yet Peter performs the act. Why? Because Jesus delegated divine authority to Peter, and Peter acts in Jesus name. Also, note that the authority to bind and loose is not limited to unlocking the door to the Gentiles. It also refers to declaring dogmatic and disciplinary decrees as well as forgiving and retaining sin (which is set forth in the passage John 20:21-23).
The Greek uses the passive voice which indicates that heaven is receiving the binding and loosing from Peter. This is an incredible statement that Jesus makes. Heaven will ratify Peters binding and loosing decisions. But in order for this to be true, Peter must be prevented from teaching error, for God cannot lie. Thus, God must penetrate the mind of Peter (just as He did when Peter confessed Jesus as the Messiah) and prevent him from teaching error. Otherwise, Jesus could not make such a sweeping promise. All this supports the Catholic understanding of the papacy.
Thanks. Well, I use Exodus and Joshua a lot for Revelation or else it wouldn't make sense to me [but not saying it still does anyway LOL>]Wow, thank you LLOJ.
Interesting indeed and than you
for posting the verses as well.
(NOT that I see the connection,
but thanks just the same for sharing
God's word)
Scripture would be awesome and helpful.
sunlover
OH COOL!!Sun, Onemouth e-mailed me her post to your thread, shes having trouble staying signed on, besides shes not much for power board posting![]()
OH COOL!!
So .. bring it on?
and the authority was given by God to his Apostles.
Wow, that was a great post she sent.I e-mailed her reply to you, did you get it? She doesnt always like to post her posts openly on huge power boards sis, she's a private board and e-mail person.
I cant blame her neither, she been around the block more then a few times to know what to share openly and what to keep to herself lol
Cool, so that's Peter? Or we all get the keys??Keys = authority of the truth.
Isaias 22, Christ has the keys....
Matthew 16, He hands them over to Peter.....
Revelation shows the one with the keys will be saved.
I think a lot of folks here are looking for truth,It should make for critical thinking if one is interested in the truth...and ultimately salvation.
How interesting Christianmom!!191 According to history there were two keys. Peter used one on the day of Pentecost to open the gate so that the Jewish believers could enter the kingdom of the heavens (Acts 2:38-42), and he used the other in the house of Cornelius to open the gate so that the Gentile believers could enter (Acts 10:34-48).
http://online.recoveryversion.org/
There we go, I was waiting for this to be said. I knew it would come sonner or later from somebody.
Since this will sooner or later get to the point of "the authority of the disciples, and the authority of the popes," I'm gonna bow out of this discussion.
God Bless
Till all are one.
Sorry to see you go, Deacon. But well, there you have it. If keys are the symbol for authority, and the keys were given to Peter... the best one could do is say they were given to Peter on behalf of the apostles. To say they are given to all believers is to make them meaningless. You might as well just leave a door unlocked than give the key to everyone. As someone raised Protestant, I have to say Protestant ways of haggling with this section of Scripture really leave something to be desired.There we go, I was waiting for this to be said. I knew it would come sonner or later from somebody.
Since this will sooner or later get to the point of "the authority of the disciples, and the authority of the popes," I'm gonna bow out of this discussion.
God Bless
Till all are one.
There we go, I was waiting for this to be said. I knew it would come sonner or later from somebody.
Since this will sooner or later get to the point of "the authority of the disciples, and the authority of the popes," I'm gonna bow out of this discussion.
God Bless
Till all are one.