...you've basically just repeated yourself in different words. You still have not provided solid proof that there is not a legitimate connection between Yahweh and Allah. All you do is vaguely cite popular level writers and mentioned supposed evangelists whose research methods are at best biased. As I've said before, serious writers, ones without agendas, would never consider Allah a separate entity from Yahweh. Just different cultural interpretations of basically the same idea.
Your logic is also somewhat screwy. So, because all semitic people other than Hebrews, and their "cousins"(samaritans, for example), developed pagan pantheons, and then later adopted a religion centered around the Hebrew God, but with some Arabic influences, their faith is absolutely less legitimate? Right. So, since Paul took the teachings of Jesus, injected it with Greek thought, and then gave it to the pagans of the Roman Empire, who then injected pagan archetypes and philosophies into his teachings, it must mean that Christianity is a false religion centered around an evolved form of some suffering-God archetype or what have you. Am I right? Does that logic make sense? Not really. But it's exactly what you, and many others, do. It isn't based in reality or facts. It's just based on people with absurd biases who have to justify their own faith by disproving the faith of others.
