Why Adventist need not be ashamed, and wear their Adventist icon in the forum!

[sentipente]

I think everyone that was baptized should set aside their differences and put on the Adventist icon especially with everyone soon or already coming in from all different denominations.

What is that supposed to mean? It almost slipped through under the radar.

 

[.chrys.]

Oh my. I see logo violations all over the place...hmm.

 

[TrustAndObey]

Oh my. I see logo violations all over the place...hmm.

You'll have to take that up with our cyber attorney.

 

[Adventist Dissident]

I did not wear my i con at first , because people prejudged me.

 

[StormyOne]

I did not wear my i con at first , because people prejudged me.

and with the icon they postjudged.... a no win situation....

 

[.chrys.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by ConstantWitness
Oh my. I see logo violations all over the place...hmm.

You'll have to take that up with our cyber attorney.

Nah. But you might be interested in The Logo and It's Meaning especially perhaps, Seventh-Day Adventist Trademark Guidelines.

 

[StormyOne]

Nah. But you might be interested in The Logo and It's Meaning especially perhaps, Seventh-Day Adventist Trademark Guidelines.

yep, I mentioned this issue before... the fact that the church does not take kindly to its name or symbols being used without permission... but hey, what do I know....

 

[IntoTheCrimsonSky]

Nah. But you might be interested in The Logo and It's Meaning especially perhaps, Seventh-Day Adventist Trademark Guidelines.

I don't think that they'd find any harm in what we were doing. Nor the fact I have the icon on my blog to proudly show what faith I am. I'm not using it in a negative way at all, nor am I causing them any issues. I see nothing in the rules that counts out these reasons.

Of course...correct me if I missed something.

 

[reddogs]

that is not enough... it is the adventist icon that must be proudly worn.... and we know what they say about pride....

Proudly, and with a lot of love to neutralize all that pride...

 

[reddogs]

yep, I mentioned this issue before... the fact that the church does not take kindly to its name or symbols being used without permission... but hey, what do I know....

Tell em you have 'special dispensation' from Red, and I'll make a few calls for favors and call in a few favors and smooth it out......

 

[reddogs]

and with the icon they postjudged.... a no win situation....

But now in the new Adventist forum, there will be no problems as the moderaters will be on you like Mequiers Wax on a shiny corvette.......

 

[reddogs]

I don't think that they'd find any harm in what we were doing. Nor the fact I have the icon on my blog to proudly show what faith I am. I'm not using it in a negative way at all, nor am I causing them any issues. I see nothing in the rules that counts out these reasons.

Of course...correct me if I missed something.

Dont worry, I put in a message to the GC lawyers and told them I would call in the 'chits' on all those basketball games with my guy as referee, and they said its 'all good'.......

 

[reddogs]

Oh my. I see logo violations all over the place...hmm.

Yes, we follow the 'spirit' of the law not the 'letter'......

 

[djconklin]

Quote:
Originally Posted by ConstantWitness


Nah. But you might be interested in The Logo and It's Meaning especially perhaps, Seventh-Day Adventist Trademark Guidelines.

yep, I mentioned this issue before... the fact that the church does not take kindly to its name or symbols being used without permission... but hey, what do I know....

It is how the symbol is being used; we're not using it to make a profit off of it, nor do I suspect that most of those who use it do so to decieve others as to their true beliefs.

 

[reddogs]

It is how the symbol is being used; we're not using it to make a profit off of it, nor do I suspect that most of those who use it do so to decieve others as to their true beliefs.

Isn't Country Doc a lawyer or knows law, maybe we should ask him.....?

 

[djconklin]

Originally Posted by djconklin
It is how the symbol is being used; we're not using it to make a profit off of it, nor do I suspect that most of those who use it do so to decieve others as to their true beliefs.

Isn't Country Doc a lawyer or knows law, maybe we should ask him.....?

Sure. In business school we only had to take one course in business law and you do pick up stuff watching the news, reading the news magaizines, the news papers and watching shows like Law and Order ...

I'd still like to argue against the idea that while one cannot drink and drive, one can drink (both parties were as they said "high as a Georgia pine") and make a binding contract!

 

[sentipente]

I'd still like to argue against the idea that while one cannot drink and drive, one can drink (both parties were as they said "high as a Georgia pine") and make a binding contract!

Why would you want to do that? It is not mental acuity that is at issue in the operation of an automobile but reaction time and control. A contract requires a meeting of the minds.

 

[reddogs]

Why would you want to do that? It is not mental acuity that is at issue in the operation of an automobile but reaction time and control. A contract requires a meeting of the minds.

Well its hard to have a 'meeting of the minds' if they are drunk as skunks and stinking up the joint as they slide under the tables......

 

[sentipente]

Well its hard to have a 'meeting of the minds' if they are drunk as skunks and stinking up the joint as they slide under the tables......

That is left for the finder of fact to determine. IAE, it has nothing to do with drunken driving.

 

[reddogs]

That is left for the finder of fact to determine. IAE, it has nothing to do with drunken driving.

Unless they were drunk while driving to the meeting...